Wow. They’re actually taking a genuine science-based approach: admitting the possibility that they may be wrong. Who would have thought?!? Can you imagine the shouting matches inside various CDC committees and ‘expert’ advisory panels before they agreed to change the wording?!! (Of course, there may not be a link, but admitting there isn’t enough evidence to conclude either way is at least shifting towards how scientific evidence should be objectively assessed.) 😊
There must have been some back-and-forth. The CDC’s note that the “vaccines do not cause autism” line remained only at the request of the HELP Committee Chair is an unmistakable rebuke to Cassidy.
Excellent article. Thanks for monitoring and keep us up to date. I’m optimistic for the future as it relates to this topic.
It’s gratifying to see a scientific agency promulgate a scientifically accurate position. Great article, thanks for educating us.
Crickets from legacy media but I guess they’re all busy with a dead guy’s rolodex.
Surely legacy media is already preparing the Jake Scotts of the world to perform their faux outrage on cue.
There's an article that just dropped in the WSJ, but it's behind a paywall.
Well, of course they are.
Maryann, Once again you are front of the line in getting this news out there. Kudos!
Thanks Dr K!
A slight movement towards the truth.
Wow. They’re actually taking a genuine science-based approach: admitting the possibility that they may be wrong. Who would have thought?!? Can you imagine the shouting matches inside various CDC committees and ‘expert’ advisory panels before they agreed to change the wording?!! (Of course, there may not be a link, but admitting there isn’t enough evidence to conclude either way is at least shifting towards how scientific evidence should be objectively assessed.) 😊
There must have been some back-and-forth. The CDC’s note that the “vaccines do not cause autism” line remained only at the request of the HELP Committee Chair is an unmistakable rebuke to Cassidy.