Despite approving a major policy shift, the CDC continues to distribute vaccine information it knows is no longer accurate — denying people informed consent.
Maryanne, I’m shocked. I’ve been going through the Jeffery Epstein dump, which is laborious. It definitely shows a relationship between Bill Gates and Jeffery Epstein building a plan for the windfall for investors after a pandemic. The depravity, not only with young girls, but the total disregard for human life is on a whole other level as long as it makes money. Money is the only goal.
Hostile bureaucrats will slow walk responses to policy changes in the hope their worldview will outlast the current Administration. Some overt DCMs (don't come Monday) are likely required to focus the attention of obstructionists on following direction.
I'm UK based so looking from the outside but '...one of the most basic rights in medicine — informed consent...,'. Really, when you have a vaccine mandate in place, can't see informed consent being present.
I even wonder if US hcps will de-register those with the critical thinking to say no thank you.
Personally, I think the whole preventative agenda is based on foundations of sand ie screening, vaccines and the likes of statins.
My GP is well aware of my position, just wondering if it would be allowed in US
I agree — mandating a product is in direct violation of informed consent. In the US, ACIP voted unanimously to move it from the ‘routine’ schedule to shared decision-making. It should therefore not be mandatory, yet some states still insist.
We have a few good people trying to change a system that is thoroughly compromised. RFK Jr and company do not have the authority to clean out the rot preventing real change. The question is who and what is getting in the way.
No surprise there ... dealing with entrenched bureaucracy aided by the sheltered workshop. It's a universal institution masquerading as 'public service'.
Clearly the current CDC director is not doing his job or both the director and acip are being sabotaged by career cdc bureaucrats who are effectively guilty of sedition within the agency. The cdc director needs to clear this up ASAP not only by amending the guidelines but also by firing the bureaucrats responsible for slow walking the required changes. Fortunately from next Thursday, I believe, it will now be possible to fire SES employees very easily .
It's almost certain that this is a result of bureaucrats that disagree with the new policy, and who go out of their way to impede the changes. Clearly those involved should be dismissed immediately. No one is expendable.
Yes, I think some careerists at the CDC have the same mindset as the American Pediatrics Association — pretending they’re operating in an alternate universe where this administration holds no real authority and can simply be outlasted.
ACIP is advisory as its name says, so it is setting directions. The question is whether HHS can force implementation of ACIP's recommendations. HHS does not seem to have control of CDC yet. Sadly there aren't enough qualified and uncorrupted people to place in the relevant top positions. I havent yet heard of much change in NIH since Jay Bhattacharya took over and cancelled a few research programs.
Most importantly, RFKjr still hasnt ended the COVID pandemic - which he has sole authority to do - and thus stop the program under which the jabs are allowed to be administered to the public without scientific justification or quality checks or liability. Mind you, the SARS-CoV-2 variants are still out there evolving (likely leading to a tsunami of death if you follow Geert Vanden Bossche). Perhaps the continued extra authority will allow him to deal with the epidemic of cancers and other problems caused by the jabs - though that is hard to believe given Trump's high profile award to Pfizer.
This echoes the failure, which you discussed in a previous post, to apply a black-box warning to the Covid vaccine despite it meeting all the criteria for doing so. It is inescapable that this dereliction of duty is due to regulatory capture. It is often said that one should not attribute to malfeasance what can be attributed to incompetence. The problem, as I see it, is that these two factors are not mutually exclusive.
In the case of the FDA’s denial of a black box warning, I would attribute that to malfeasance, at least on the basis of what my sources report. I'm less clear about what is happening in the CDC.
Maryanne, I’m shocked. I’ve been going through the Jeffery Epstein dump, which is laborious. It definitely shows a relationship between Bill Gates and Jeffery Epstein building a plan for the windfall for investors after a pandemic. The depravity, not only with young girls, but the total disregard for human life is on a whole other level as long as it makes money. Money is the only goal.
I know right...it was shocking to see Peter Attia's emails. Ugghh.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Excellent and disappointing example of the policy-practice gap in action.
Thanks, Sheila. its important that ACIP’s work is more than symbolic, and that any votes for policy change are fully implemented.
Hostile bureaucrats will slow walk responses to policy changes in the hope their worldview will outlast the current Administration. Some overt DCMs (don't come Monday) are likely required to focus the attention of obstructionists on following direction.
Yes — I suspect there are still a few cobwebs that need clearing out at the CDC.
I'm UK based so looking from the outside but '...one of the most basic rights in medicine — informed consent...,'. Really, when you have a vaccine mandate in place, can't see informed consent being present.
I even wonder if US hcps will de-register those with the critical thinking to say no thank you.
Personally, I think the whole preventative agenda is based on foundations of sand ie screening, vaccines and the likes of statins.
My GP is well aware of my position, just wondering if it would be allowed in US
I agree — mandating a product is in direct violation of informed consent. In the US, ACIP voted unanimously to move it from the ‘routine’ schedule to shared decision-making. It should therefore not be mandatory, yet some states still insist.
Three states are in the process of outlawing covid vaccines- Minnesota, Arizona, Tennessee. This is what I read today.
Is that the process Leslie Manookian is behind?....If so, she is doing great work.
Nicolas Hulscher from Focal Points (Courageous Discourse) sent this out today:
"BREAKING: Third U.S. State Introduces Legislation Designating mRNA Injections as Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction."
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-third-us-state-introduces
Such a slow change. So much dead wood at the CDC. And the TGA.
We have a few good people trying to change a system that is thoroughly compromised. RFK Jr and company do not have the authority to clean out the rot preventing real change. The question is who and what is getting in the way.
No surprise there ... dealing with entrenched bureaucracy aided by the sheltered workshop. It's a universal institution masquerading as 'public service'.
Clearly the current CDC director is not doing his job or both the director and acip are being sabotaged by career cdc bureaucrats who are effectively guilty of sedition within the agency. The cdc director needs to clear this up ASAP not only by amending the guidelines but also by firing the bureaucrats responsible for slow walking the required changes. Fortunately from next Thursday, I believe, it will now be possible to fire SES employees very easily .
I remember the Secretary saying he asked CDC officials for data and that the request was slow-walked -- I think they eventually left the agency.
It's almost certain that this is a result of bureaucrats that disagree with the new policy, and who go out of their way to impede the changes. Clearly those involved should be dismissed immediately. No one is expendable.
Yes, I think some careerists at the CDC have the same mindset as the American Pediatrics Association — pretending they’re operating in an alternate universe where this administration holds no real authority and can simply be outlasted.
Of what use are proclamations without follow-through? Demand action to put informed consent into practice!
I think this could shake things up. ACIP is unlikely to stand by and allow the CDC to make a mockery of the process. That’s my sense at the moment.
ACIP is advisory as its name says, so it is setting directions. The question is whether HHS can force implementation of ACIP's recommendations. HHS does not seem to have control of CDC yet. Sadly there aren't enough qualified and uncorrupted people to place in the relevant top positions. I havent yet heard of much change in NIH since Jay Bhattacharya took over and cancelled a few research programs.
Most importantly, RFKjr still hasnt ended the COVID pandemic - which he has sole authority to do - and thus stop the program under which the jabs are allowed to be administered to the public without scientific justification or quality checks or liability. Mind you, the SARS-CoV-2 variants are still out there evolving (likely leading to a tsunami of death if you follow Geert Vanden Bossche). Perhaps the continued extra authority will allow him to deal with the epidemic of cancers and other problems caused by the jabs - though that is hard to believe given Trump's high profile award to Pfizer.
This echoes the failure, which you discussed in a previous post, to apply a black-box warning to the Covid vaccine despite it meeting all the criteria for doing so. It is inescapable that this dereliction of duty is due to regulatory capture. It is often said that one should not attribute to malfeasance what can be attributed to incompetence. The problem, as I see it, is that these two factors are not mutually exclusive.
In the case of the FDA’s denial of a black box warning, I would attribute that to malfeasance, at least on the basis of what my sources report. I'm less clear about what is happening in the CDC.