28 Comments
User's avatar
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Re “the latest data on Infanrix-Hexa® have raised broader questions about the safety of the newer generation of vaccines designed to protect against multiple diseases within a single shot”.

Seriously - multi-component shots given over and again, eg Infanrix-Hexa® administered to babies at two, four and six months. This is an aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine, the aluminium is there to create an inflammatory response.

Do the doctors and nurses who administer these shots actually know what they’re doing?

How do they obtain valid informed consent? Particularly as parents are coerced/incentivised to have these injections for their children via the No Jab, No Pay/No Play laws.

It’s not possible to obtain valid consent under these conditions.

See the submission I made challenging the No Jab, No Pay bill in 2015: https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=18970842-0622-49d1-a6b7-f7b1d2e9a7f7&subId=405305

The ever-increasing ‘womb to tomb’ vaccination schedule* is a disaster area, mired in conflicts of interest.

There must be an urgent investigation…

*National Immunisation Program Schedule: https://www.health.gov.au/topics/immunisation/when-to-get-vaccinated/national-immunisation-program-schedule

Expand full comment
Gareth Thomas's avatar

No, the doctors and nurses who administer these shots have no idea what they're doing.

From personal experience over 40 years.

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

I think the majority believe (and hope) it has all been exquisitely tested over many years...After all, you're giving these products to healthy babies.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

'Hope' doesn't cut it Maryanne...

Doctors and nurses and others are just 'following the guidelines', just 'following orders'... https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/just-following-orders

These medical people have a legal, ethical and moral obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent.

It's not happening.

Also see Section IV. Mass Population Vaccination and Rogers v Whitaker, in my paper: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, 6 June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

I agree… but I’m told doctors have to practise defensive medicine… follow the guidelines to avoid malpractice liability.

Expand full comment
Gareth Thomas's avatar

Very true.

The breadth of general practice means GP's have to accept pretty well everything they're told by "The Experts".

There is little available time to do their own research, medicolegal and deregistration threats if they dissent.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Who told you that Maryanne?

Here's something to think about...

"Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."

That's as confirmed by the Australian Government: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf

It's not happening. Authentic valid consent for vaccination is not happening.

When are people going to get on the front foot about challenging this instead of taking a passive position?

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

Isn’t it just astounding? 6 vaccines and babies die? And the TGA go blithely on. I am not medically trained but a retired teacher who to my shame had to recommend vaccines to the Kindies that I did assessments on before school.

Why Hepatitis? Maryam asked Plotkin. His answer was unsatisfactory.

Little tiny babies bodies being injected with all those substances that haven’t been tested properly.

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Agree, Plotkin's response to the Hep B question didn't really land well. I have more coming on these 'newer' multivalent vaccines....

Expand full comment
Steve Kirsch's avatar

I have alway been very impressed with the depth of your reporting and this article is no exception. Please see my DM on X to you. Thanks for your work!

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Thanks Steve…. Will take a look!

Expand full comment
Margaret-Rose Stringer's avatar

Christ almighty, Maryanne !! - no wonder this body is so frequently giving you headaches.

It's actually terrifying that the TGA, of all our bureaucracies, is given unlimited leeway ...

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Yep, over many weeks TGA promised it would respond, then it asked for a 20 day extension and then it ghosted me completely!

Expand full comment
Margaret-Rose Stringer's avatar

I can't think of any avenue via which we the much-put-upon could force a reckoning of these bastards - other than some kind of mass rising against our pollies ...

Expand full comment
Wolf-Dietrich Spelsberg's avatar

They know nearly nothing about this wonder of the nature of immunity and play with children. Nothing learnd from the Nürnberg Codex.

Expand full comment
Peter Milne's avatar

I wonder how often a SIDS death is reported to the adverse reactions when most doctors discourage this. Medical professionals are told time and time again that there is no link. They would be devastated if they know there was a link. I suspect that many health professionals need to shield themselves from this information/possibility - the guilt of what they've done (is there is a link) might overwhelm then completely .

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

This goes to the heart of the matter Peter. How often would a link be made between the vaccine and SIDS? “Never”, according to SIDS campaigners…… https://rednose.org.au/news/myth-bust-vaccinations-do-not-cause-sids

If only the TGA would do its job and investigate 🤷🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment
JB watching TV's avatar

Keep Shining That Torch 🔦 into the dark corners !

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Will do, JB! 👊🏼

Keep those TV recommendations coming 🙌

Expand full comment
norstadt's avatar

Don't we live in the age of electronic medical records? Many countries must have complete data that includes when the shot was given and when someone died. If there were no correlation, it would be straightforward to put this topic to rest.

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Given that the one agency tasked with monitoring this information is sleeping, I have no faith in the system.....In this case, some reported deaths are on the public DAENs but most are kept on the TGA's internal database, hidden from the public.If it weren't for the FOI, we wouldn't know about them.

Expand full comment
norstadt's avatar

Still, at some point it will not be possible to hide behind unknown under reporting factors. Everything is reported.

Expand full comment
Margaret-Rose Stringer's avatar

Tempted to say - so I shall - dream on ...

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

Just astonishing!! Six vaccines in one dose!! Isn’t this what Plotkin was talking about? What planet are we on? Didn’t someone think - this might cause a problem. How will we know if there are adverse events?

Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Yeah, Plotkin's response didn't really land. I have more on this coming.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 30
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

Drug companies fund their own clinical trials, collect their own data, write their own manuscripts, conduct their own quality control testing, construct their own regulatory dossiers and monitor the safety of their own products…. Have you ever heard of a more corrupt and ridiculous system…? I haven’t.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 28
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Maryanne Demasi, PhD's avatar

As I say (every week now)...the world has gone mad. Eek!

Expand full comment