The 10 ng safety limit for residual DNA in vaccines has jumped 1,000-fold over the decades. An investigation reveals the global standard is built on assumptions—not robust evidence.
What is truly shocking is that the vaccinators injecting these concoctions have no idea what they’re doing, there’s no way they can obtain valid voluntary informed consent.
Seems that the vaxx companies and regulators do a whole lot of "assuming".
1. Assuming that the 10ng safety limit for residual DNA is OK
2. Assuming no long term testing of the covid vaxx or other novel mRNA vaxxes is necessary
3. Assuming covid vaxxes are "safe and effective", despite more in the vaxxed cohort dying than the non vaxxed
4. Assuming that no gold standard inert placebo testing is required
and the last one,
Assuming that the general public are complete idiots who will swallow any lie from a white coated "scientist" or a mainstream journalist.
Present company excepted but at this stage they seem to be getting away with all their assumptions so far, although the cracks are starting to appear...
It is good to pursue public safety one issue at a time so that people understand the scope of the problem and lack of scientific knowledge. Some articles mention a dozen things wrong with the recent mRNA and DNA products and peoples eyes glaze over. or assume you are choosing a partisan political side.
Quote: "Rather than citing clinical studies, regulators pointed to the “millions of doses” administered without obvious harm."
Consider adding a caution to that regulators statement, because it is demonstrably false and should not go unchallenged. Just because they do not diligently collect data and indeed conspire with manufacturers to ignore evidence of harm does not mean it is not occurring. VAERS and EudraVigilance and YellowCard and even the clinical studies all show significant harms from vaccines and biological countermeasures (the Covid mRNA products) .
It’s the one more thing - we in big pharma / regulator guidance used an untested assumption but that’s okay in getting faster to market and modifying human systems to conquer disease .
Like covid the push for novel vaccine approval quickly meant that if FDA approved TGA followed with no independant testing and potentially EMA. At least where the big pharma’s own trials replicate for all regulators.
We know under Morrison/Skerritt the Comirnaty non clinical trial that Morrison proclaimed had been totally safe, after 18 mths the FOI showed a monkey death and organ damage - info released just as FDA was telling mRNA manufacturers they must keep records of myo/periocarditis)
New this yr - shingles vax reduces Alzheimer’s..
Now with many scared of longterm development of Alzheimer’s (from say 40yrs over 30 to 40 yrs?) the importance of shingles vax will explode so it is disturbing to see the 10ng unrefined assumptions are likely there too.
We don’t use a vaccine to stop tooth decay or sunburn just topical preventatives - so maybe like toothpaste, sunscreen, barrier antivirals (acyclovir, Astodrimer sodium, nitric oxide etc) need more consideration re human non absorption safety instead of lifelong or at least a year!!! modifying our blood and tissue and risking 10ng of DNA contamination which might cause cancers and other devastating diseases.
Maybe this is just ignorance of a non scientist Marianne - just please be honest as I know you are and tell me if I am way off reality.
Honestly, I don’t know what to think anymore… the more I look, the more I realise how little I know — and the more obvious it becomes that they don’t know either.
I heard RFK jnr during the demented grilling by ignorant senators say this week that the Europeans don't use the chicken pox vaccine because it causes shingles in older people. I think from reading Turtles-the varicella vaccine doesn't do the job.
I think there is probably a difference between long term vaccines And the hurriedly developed COVID and flu vaccines which are shown to lose effectiveness very quickly ie under a year AND NOT ERADICATED A DISEASE
Thank you Maryanne. You have such great posts. I’ve noticed in life the more you know the more you realize how much you don’t know. I’m completely shocked that all of our countries have refused to take covid vaccine injuries seriously. This raises many questions for me. I read Kevin regularly and have much admiration for him, he seems to discover more and more horror stories about these shots regularly. How many people have been damaged in the past that we never hear about? But, the assumptions about science keep getting repeated, then based on what, they’ve decided to broaden acceptable levels of for instance DNA contamination. Has the limit been determined this time around? But wait, vaccine injuries from the covid shots have been denied so nothing to learn here.
As a non science person I find this astounding as these supposed clever people merrily assume and don't test their assumptions. We aren't safe from the medical or scientific community.
What is truly shocking is that the vaccinators injecting these concoctions have no idea what they’re doing, there’s no way they can obtain valid voluntary informed consent.
There is no valid consent for vaccination.
Yes Elizabeth. Primum non nocere has become null and void and been replaced by "follow the science", whatever that means!
Brilliant piece by Doc MaDem!
Facts, figures and fully researched!
This is what REAL investigatory science journalism really looks like 👍
What do we get in the MSM ? Shills, sops and sellouts.
Keep up the Great Work !....and have a lovely weekend 😘
Thanks JB, enjoy your weekend 🙌
Seems that the vaxx companies and regulators do a whole lot of "assuming".
1. Assuming that the 10ng safety limit for residual DNA is OK
2. Assuming no long term testing of the covid vaxx or other novel mRNA vaxxes is necessary
3. Assuming covid vaxxes are "safe and effective", despite more in the vaxxed cohort dying than the non vaxxed
4. Assuming that no gold standard inert placebo testing is required
and the last one,
Assuming that the general public are complete idiots who will swallow any lie from a white coated "scientist" or a mainstream journalist.
Present company excepted but at this stage they seem to be getting away with all their assumptions so far, although the cracks are starting to appear...
You got it!
Beautifully put.
There is one other assumption that our politicians will represent the people who elected them and not like $$$$ from big pharma donors or lobbyists
It is good to pursue public safety one issue at a time so that people understand the scope of the problem and lack of scientific knowledge. Some articles mention a dozen things wrong with the recent mRNA and DNA products and peoples eyes glaze over. or assume you are choosing a partisan political side.
Quote: "Rather than citing clinical studies, regulators pointed to the “millions of doses” administered without obvious harm."
Consider adding a caution to that regulators statement, because it is demonstrably false and should not go unchallenged. Just because they do not diligently collect data and indeed conspire with manufacturers to ignore evidence of harm does not mean it is not occurring. VAERS and EudraVigilance and YellowCard and even the clinical studies all show significant harms from vaccines and biological countermeasures (the Covid mRNA products) .
Yes, as Kevin McKernan previously said, “But billions of cigarettes were smoked too, and that didn’t make them safe.”
It’s the one more thing - we in big pharma / regulator guidance used an untested assumption but that’s okay in getting faster to market and modifying human systems to conquer disease .
Like covid the push for novel vaccine approval quickly meant that if FDA approved TGA followed with no independant testing and potentially EMA. At least where the big pharma’s own trials replicate for all regulators.
We know under Morrison/Skerritt the Comirnaty non clinical trial that Morrison proclaimed had been totally safe, after 18 mths the FOI showed a monkey death and organ damage - info released just as FDA was telling mRNA manufacturers they must keep records of myo/periocarditis)
New this yr - shingles vax reduces Alzheimer’s..
Now with many scared of longterm development of Alzheimer’s (from say 40yrs over 30 to 40 yrs?) the importance of shingles vax will explode so it is disturbing to see the 10ng unrefined assumptions are likely there too.
We don’t use a vaccine to stop tooth decay or sunburn just topical preventatives - so maybe like toothpaste, sunscreen, barrier antivirals (acyclovir, Astodrimer sodium, nitric oxide etc) need more consideration re human non absorption safety instead of lifelong or at least a year!!! modifying our blood and tissue and risking 10ng of DNA contamination which might cause cancers and other devastating diseases.
Maybe this is just ignorance of a non scientist Marianne - just please be honest as I know you are and tell me if I am way off reality.
Honestly, I don’t know what to think anymore… the more I look, the more I realise how little I know — and the more obvious it becomes that they don’t know either.
Long ago and this defines my age, there was a movie called BLOW UP that kept looking closer and closer at a photograph until there was no answer
That the key-they don't know either.
I heard RFK jnr during the demented grilling by ignorant senators say this week that the Europeans don't use the chicken pox vaccine because it causes shingles in older people. I think from reading Turtles-the varicella vaccine doesn't do the job.
I think there is probably a difference between long term vaccines And the hurriedly developed COVID and flu vaccines which are shown to lose effectiveness very quickly ie under a year AND NOT ERADICATED A DISEASE
Turtles didn’t have anything good to say about any of the long term vaccines.
Thank you Maryanne. You have such great posts. I’ve noticed in life the more you know the more you realize how much you don’t know. I’m completely shocked that all of our countries have refused to take covid vaccine injuries seriously. This raises many questions for me. I read Kevin regularly and have much admiration for him, he seems to discover more and more horror stories about these shots regularly. How many people have been damaged in the past that we never hear about? But, the assumptions about science keep getting repeated, then based on what, they’ve decided to broaden acceptable levels of for instance DNA contamination. Has the limit been determined this time around? But wait, vaccine injuries from the covid shots have been denied so nothing to learn here.
Thanks Vivien. X
But Luckily for the Vaxx manufacturers..
No reporters can find substacks like this...
It needs the Onion router and you need to know the exact dark web address and the secret passwords.....
As a non science person I find this astounding as these supposed clever people merrily assume and don't test their assumptions. We aren't safe from the medical or scientific community.
And they want us to believe them?
Great question Maryanne pity no one has an answer 🙏
Ha! I take the absence of evidence as a loud signal—they’ve got nuffin!