29 Comments

In politics, evidence base and truth play second fiddle to party narrative. Only ways to induce change are in a court of law or in the court of public opinion. The former seems sabotaged by the establishment and the latter is slowly gaining momentum.

Expand full comment

The judicial system in Australia seems compromised, so it will have to be in the court of public opinion. A grass roots movement.

Expand full comment

It seems not only the Judicial is compromised.

I wonder if the incoming Trump administration and focus might have any sway, influence on actions like this?

Expand full comment

Honestly, I don’t know…I’ve only know the Australian government to double down…

Expand full comment

Exactly, we have to get this matter exposed in the court of public opinion.

There is so much the public doesn’t know…

They’ve been subjected to a torrent of lies, aka mis/disinformation, from governments and their cronies for years.

How to alert a propagandised public to the treachery of governments and others?

Expand full comment

Propaganda, in other words the big lie is a huge problem but following hard on its heels is a huge knock on problem based on a powerful part of human nature. It’s called denial. Where it comes to their health and safety people absolutely cannot bear to think that they’ve been duped so despite the evidence that is presented to them they will deny it. Many will even refuse to hear the contrary evidence labelling as mere conjecture or conspiracy theory. That is why the court of public opinion is moving along so slowly.

Expand full comment

Exactly right, Max. You have nailed what is probably the biggest barrier to exposing the truth about the biomedical evil that has been perpetrated since 2020 – namely, the innate psychological drive for ‘denial’ in people that prevents them from accepting that they have made a mistake. I have learnt more about human nature in the last five years than in all the years that came before.

Expand full comment

[Moving forward, Broadbent said....] - thank you Mr Broadbent. At least there are a few parliamentarians trying to keep the bastards honest.

Expand full comment

"For a decision maker to make such a large impactful decision that would unduly worry Australians, the evidence relied upon must be legally, scientifically, and clinically sound."

Like mandating the "safe and effective" so-called vaccines on the public as well as masks and school closures.

Expand full comment

It would be hilarious, if it wasn't so tragic.

Expand full comment

Maryanne. The assertions of the covid vaxxes saving lives are completely false and it's dangerous for our health officials to keep repeating this lie, and keeping these poisons available.

Prof Norman Fenton reviewed almost 40 papers which suggest covid vaxx efficacy, and all of them introduce delays between jab date and being considered jabbed. He has proven this falsely implies efficacy when all it is is a statistical sleight of hand.

These jabs will be banned at some stage when RFK and others ban them in the US, but many more will be killed and injured in the meantime. Russell and all of us here are right to be very disappointed.

Expand full comment

Yes, I'm glad that Russell et. al. are not giving up...

Expand full comment

A response that could be expected. They don't want to be the government who tells the country that 90% of them are at risk of SAESIs and cancer, but they are actively suppressing damage reports and no plan is in place to monitor results nor research to remedy the effects nor provide compensation.

Expand full comment

Indeed, it's a mess.

Expand full comment

The key phrase in the response is “that would unduly worry Australians”. Can’t have people realizing they might have been POISONED, and by their own government.

Expand full comment

No-one has done more to "unduly worry Australians" than the Australian government. The secrecy and intransigence has been appalling.

Expand full comment

Excellent article as usual

Expand full comment

Thanks Steve

Expand full comment

🙏 When you have no duty of care to the Australian people you can approve anything

Expand full comment

Disgusting, they try hard to cover the biggest crime in medical history… go on!

Expand full comment

I suspect they've done a cost-benefit analysis and determined that its better to cover it up and hope we all go away than to admit fault and open themselves up to protracted and expensive lawsuits.

Expand full comment

My sister was married to Karl Lauterbach, so I know the scene very well.

Expand full comment

Never ever!

Expand full comment

There are none so blind as those who WILL NOT see

Expand full comment

Very timely Maryanne with the release yesterday of Ulkrike Kammerer's paper confirming the plasmid DNA contamination at high level

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/

Expand full comment

https://rumble.com/v5vdpsn-covid-under-question.html?e9s=rel_v2_pr

Senator Malcolm Roberts hosts his third inquiry into the COVID response, bringing together international experts for compelling insights and new developments that add to the call for a COVID Royal Commission.

Features comments by Maverick USA Senator Ron Johnson.

Expand full comment

I don't think the reason for rejecting the request will fill anyone with confidence.

Expand full comment

Meanwhile the elephant in the room continues to be ignored…

THERE IS NO VALID CONSENT FOR VACCINATION.

NONE.

Because no-one is properly informed about their risk of disease and about the vaccine products.

The practitioners administering these medical products - nurses, doctors, pharmacists etc - have no idea what they’re doing, they are not ‘experts’ in the diseases or vaccine products, they are not qualified to obtain ‘informed consent’ for this medical intervention.

They’re just following government guidelines, acting as agents of the state sticking these needles and contents into people, and not obtaining authentic valid consent for this penetration.

They’re just following orders… See: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/just-following-orders

Most shocking of all is that the medical profession collaborated with coercion and vaccine mandates.

If they were doing their legal, ethical and moral duty they would be refusing to inject people they know are under duress, i.e. under coercion and mandates.

There’s no way they can obtain voluntary informed consent from people who are under duress to submit to the injections.

THERE IS NO VALID CONSENT.

What is this going to mean when the penny drops?

Expand full comment

The TGA continues to fail and obfuscate downwards.

Expand full comment