Will any of us ever get back to normal after the devastation of Covid and government coercion and mandates? The US is still grappling with it, and no one has been held accountable yet. The stories in Australia appear to be just as bad. RFKJr and President Trump are doing what they can to change what was done to Americans, but, except for a few losing their jobs, no one has paid the price for their actions.
No one in the US paid any price for their violations of human, medical,and constitutional rights. The medical industry has gone into hiding either from shame or arrogance. The legal and judicial system were fearful members of the laptop class that did not fulfill their supposed duty for protection of rights. The executive branch were lapdogs for public health. The legislative bodies have not fulfilled their oaths to the constitution and have not examined the violations. Public health saved no one. They increased misery and deaths in excess of the disease.
Maryanne, I did buy the book. I haven’t finished it because sometimes I need to get away from it all and read a novel or some other such distraction. From the substack midwestern doctor, I watched a clip from 60 minutes on the swine flu in 1976, it’s was all the same obfuscation as now. It angers me that no diagnostic tests exist nor medical codes. Cancer rates are up worldwide but governments are side stepping that one too, they’re blaming it on everything else but the real cause. In their mind it can’t be due to the shots because of the amount of time gone by past the shot. I don’t know what the upshot of all of their denials is going to be, but in my mind it’s imperative we have diagnostics.
Why? if you "followed the science" without thinking and had to come to terms with the idea that you have hurt people with a medical intervention..why would you think about it?..The cognitive dissonance would be huge..Its best to not think, follow the herd and "move on"..
I agree with you. I also question what countries had to agree to when signing the shot contracts. Pharma had the huge advantage, they held countries over the barrel. The public were clamouring for them, sadly including me. We were promised two shots and the pandemic would be over, which put governments under a lot of pressure. No government knew anything about these shots that used this new technology, except for the manufacturers. Pharma ruled.
The National Citizens Inquiry testimonies also continue in Canada this month. Evidence from hundreds of people, all available for viewing on Rumble. Dr David Martin has the exposed the intellectual property pathways and just needs to find a justice system interested in trying the case. Only 1 provincial politician has showed up to testify. One.
That's why Albertans will be voting YES to separation from confederation. We don't need to be governed by corrupt idiots. Alberta Prosperity Project. A costed plan to become a new nation. The banana Republic of Canaduh is no longer required.
In an article published in Quadrant in January 2021 [1], Robert Clancy said:
QUOTE
...In Australia, every encouragement should support over 90% vaccination, with whatever of the available vaccines are available: dissention and argument over "false news" undermines this endeavour. In other words, though immunity with Covid19 vaccination appears to be neither complete nor durable, any chance of approaching "herd immunity" depends on a near 100% vaccination rate...
the Australian community need to get behind a "vaccine for us all" programme, if even the slightest chance of herd immunity is to be achieved.
END OF QUOTE
Were the millions of Australians, including children, who've now been injected, at serious risk of the group of common respiratory symptoms called 'COVID-19'?
The millions of Australians who have been injected under MANDATES, and the violation of valid voluntary informed consent - were they all at risk of 'COVID-19'?
How could Robert Clancy ever justify his call for a "near 100% vaccination rate" and "a "vaccine for us all" programme" using these experimental interventions? Former Health Minister Greg Hunt admitted in February 2021: "The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever..."[2]
With no valid voluntary informed consent!
What on earth motivated Robert Clancy to come out with his highly questionable 'advice' in January 2021?
References:
1. COVID-19: A realistic approach to community management. Quadrant Online, 17 January 202.
Maryanne, I am fed up with the likes of Clancy, Dalgleish, Malhotra, Campbell, and Ioannidis getting off the hook on this.
This is a MAJOR part of the story. These so-called 'experts' demanded people be vaccinated...They had no bloody idea what they were talking about!
And now it seems billions of people are injected around the world...WITH NO VALID VOLUNTARY INFORMED CONSENT!!!
This idea of 'experts'...it's got to be shot down in flames.
'Experts'!!! The damage these people have done!!!
Loads of them, all throughout the system...the blessed 'experts', they were beyond question, protected from criticism, and people like me, who dared to question, were shut down.
I challenged Robert Clancy about that January 2021 Quadrant article on an email group in February 2023, and apart from a couple of people, I didn't get much in the way of support from others on that list, many of whom were doctors who were probably appalled that a mere peasant was challenging 'the great professor'. It was a pure fluke I was on that list at all, certainly not on it now.
Same with Angus Dalgleish - when I raise the atrocious July 2021 Daily Mail article people are so dazzled by his professor/oncologist status, they're willing to forgive any transgression...such as him demanding millions of young people submit to the jabs...
Honestly, it makes me sick!
I've been challenging 'experts' for years, including your mates Gotzsche and Jefferson about that rubbish LID aluminium and vaccine safety review by 'Cochrane Vaccines Field authors' (also relevant to HPV vaccination), and I wouldn't give you tuppence ha'penny for the lot of them.
Where were they when it counted? Would you care to guess how many 'experts' have supported me publicly re my quest for valid voluntary informed consent?
And here I will give Angus Dalgleish his due, because he did speak out publicly for me on the thread with BMJ editor in chief Kamran Abbasi, saying "I write in total support of Elizabeth Hart" in response to my email about informed consent and mandates, but Dalgleish's statement supporting me was subsequently erased by The Daily Sceptic and The Conservative Woman stories, which of course focussed on the cancer angle, but overlooked the also vital issue of informed consent/mandates.
See this email thread with my response to Dalgleish...and note all the people copied on it: Covid jabs, informed consent, indemnity, and medical ethics... Response to Gus
(Note this was the email I sent to him before I discovered his terrible July 2021 Daily Mail article...)
I suggest you read my email thread with Angus Dalgleish very carefully Maryanne, because this trashing of informed consent fiasco has to break some time, it's way past time for the shit to hit the fan. Really Maryanne, check it out, there is dynamite in there, particularly about the practitioners being led to believe they had liability protection for giving the jabs...but the situation is going to get very interesting if they didn't get authentic valid consent for administering the injections under mandates.
Elizabeth I agree with you but I disagree on your fighting strategy. If these “experts” were the tip of the spear for the enemy in the beginning, I have no problem thrusting that back into the heart of the enemy now. It’s basic martial arts.
I don’t have the knowledge, language, or eloquence that these guys do. They’re now working for us and hating them isn’t going to make my life any better.
This was a crucial time when the population was under tremendous pressure to submit to vaccination, and when vaccine mandates were coming in Australia.
What on earth was going on with people such as Dalgleish and Robert Clancy (see my previous comment), and others such as Aseem Malhotra and John Campbell, that they would come out so aggressively pressing these products?! Did they have a clue what they were talking about?!
Its incredible.
I was flabbergasted when I came across that July 2021 Daily Mail article featuring Angus Dalgleish.
In November 2022, Dalgleish had publicly spoken up to support me on an email thread including key people (including Robert Clancy), primarily addressed to Kamran Abbasi, editor in chief of The BMJ. It was gutting to subsequently discover Dalgleish had previously been such a strident promoter of the COVID-19 vaccination for young people.
Now people such as Dalgleish and Clancy are speaking out...after billions of people have been injected - without valid voluntary informed consent!
Yet how do they explain their complicity in the launching of this coercive vaccination plan, which is now brushed away under the carpet, covered up...
This must be all out in the open now, how this deliberately manufactured 'crisis' unfolded, using so-called 'experts' to press the vaccine products on the population.
There must be transparency and accountability to make sure this never happens again.
A lot of people had that awakening moment during Covid. I’ll be the first to admit that I once supported the Gardasil vaccine, until I took a closer look at the data. Everyone goes through that “journey of discovery” in their own time, which is why your work is so important, Elizabeth—it keeps the issue of informed consent alive rather than letting it fade into the background.
I have been following your work Elizabeth and so admire your tenacity to get to the bottom of this utterly disgusting debacle and the lack of informed consent. So surprised about Clancy, he certainly changed his tune since earlier days of pushing the jab. I wonder do you read Sasha Latypova on Substack at all? She and legal sleuth Katherine Watt have researched laws in the US which do not allow for informed consent, because the products were developed as countermeasures to bioterrorism under Dept of Defence. I believe everyone in power or of influence were required to push these products knowing they would kill and injure.
If you're following my work you should know I have correspondence from the Australian Government and AHPRA confirming that vaccinating practitioners have an obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination...and this cannot be done under pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES!
This has now been on the record for years, and apparently studiously ignored by key figures in the so-called 'Freedom Movement'...who seem to dominate the narrative.
Sorry to sound terse, but this is really getting serious now, the persistent resistance to acknowledging the requirement for valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, I have certainly had little or no support on this matter from the medical 'profession'...and no wonder... Because I suggest there is NO VALID CONSENT under pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES.
Pity they remained BLIND to the Australian antiviral nasal spray VIRALEZE™ using Astodrimer sodium dendrimer by CSIRO which Morrison is probably implicated in killing even though it was MRFF BTB award winner. How can any authors on this topic miss this out. Europe re-approved it under new 2025 MDR Class2a but Australian 4 years after are denied prophylactic and TREATMENT with better efficacy in standard risk vaxed than Paxlovid. Surely it warranted a mention in this book although maybe all those health professional authors are scared of being fined by TGA themselves for infringing / RESTRICTED REPRESENTATIONS
MaryAnne this is such an opportunity missed - with authors missing one of the worst Australians killings of its own inventions in the pandemic
So - Let down again - even the critics of the Australian responses seem muzzled or maybe the censorship has been so strong that no-one will step out with truth
I bought this book Maryanne faintly expecting (hoping❓) there would be mention of a victim of TGA INFRINGEMENT NOTICES - the Astodrimer sodium antiviral nasal spray VIRALEZE with proven RPC efficacy as early COVID treatment - developed from CSIRO DENDRIMERS
1️⃣ Viraleze antiviral nasal sprays by Starpharma 2022 Award by Australian Government dept of health and dept of industry
Starpharma awarded $1 million in matched funding by the Australian Government’s Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Biomedical Translation Bridge (BTB) Program to expedite development and commercialisation of VIRALEZE
Winner “Most significant commercial outcome”. DOHAC winner 13 months after TGA (also in DOHAC) irrationally banned & fined product info in Australia despite 35 regulators internationally including European EMA in 2020 approving as Medical Device
2️⃣ Sept 2024 - Astodrimer Sodium Nasal Spray versus Placebo in Non-Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
7️⃣ Dec 2022 DART conference Astodrimer sodium v other nasal sprays Scripp presentation. In-viva (mouse model) euthanised to study viral load nasal cavity trachea and lung at 4 and 7 days. Comparators nitric oxide, HPMC, heparin, iota-carrageenan, Astodrimer sodium (Viraleze) v saline (PBS)
Victorian State Government report by KPMG January 2021
The research presented in this paper was commissioned by Victoria’s Lead Scientist, Dr Amanda Caples, and the Victorian Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (DJPR
Starpharma, an ASX300 company located in Melbourne, has developed a novel antiviral nasal spray, VIRALEZE™, which inactivates more than 99.99 percent of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. VIRALEZE™ is a broad spectrum antiviral nasal spray and is virucidal against SARS-CoV-2 and works by blocking the spike proteins on the SARS-CoV-2 and preventing them from binding to host cells thus preventing infection. Starpharma is finalising regulatory documents and manufacturing product in preparation for launch which is planned for the first quarter of 2021. Apart from VIRALEZE™ being a Victorian discovery, critical antiviral testing of the spray was conducted at 360Biolabs at the height of the pandemic in March 2020. Had this testing not been available locally the rapid development of the product would have been significantly compromised. Starpharma was awarded
$1 million in MRFF funding to expedite development and commercialisation of VIRALEZE™
VIRALEZE™
European medical device regulations February 2025:
Earlier this month, Starpharma received certification for ViralezeTM under the new European Union (EU) Medical Device Regulations (MDR). Under the new EU MDR classifications, medical device manufacturers must demonstrate compliance with certain essential requirements and undergo a new conformity assessment process with a Europea pd Notified Body. Achieving EU MDR certification demonstrates that ViralezeTM and the research supporting the product meet the necessary safety and performance
❌❌❌
BUT SEEMS EVEN THOSE CRITICAL OF WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA IN THE PANDEMIC, LET MILLIONS OF OVER 12YR OLD AUSTRALIANS DOWN BY NOT EXPOSING THE DEAL MORRISON DID TO GET PFIZER MRNA VAX AND PAXLOVID ON 9 APRIL 2021 as long as the competition from VIRALEZE™ was killed
Povidone-iodine is all the book says any nasal spray - nothing VIRALEZE™, iota-carrageenan, nitric oxide
Plenty of mention of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine
“….Povidone-iodine (real-time meta-analysis 21 studies) is another simple safe addition to covid therapy regimens: in vitro it kills 99.99% of Covid-19 virus within 30 seconds, and can reduce transmission of infection within an outbreak, with more rapid viral clearance, though clinical benefit is less clear. Covid-19 infection typically starts in the upper respiratory tract and specifically the nasal respiratory epithelium. The primary initial route for entry into the central nervous system is thought to be the olfactory nerve in the nasal cavity. Minimising early replication in the upper respiratory tract may reduce spread within neural tissues. Early or prophylactic nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal treatment can avoid the consequences of viral replication, though the extent of clinical benefits for the individual requires further study.
In conclusion, it appears that for treatment of Covid-19, clinicalobservational studies published by clinicians often include many drugs claiming impressive results such as 90% reduction of serious outcomes, particularly when subjects with risk factors are selected and treatment begins early. It is less clear which combination is optimal. Hydroxychloroquine and/or ivermectin are generally the base therapy, with the useful addition of easily obtained drugs s as
vitamin D and zinc. Povidine-iodine used as a throat gargle and for hasall irrigation reduces viral transmission by reducing viral load and persistence infected individuals….”
Would like to talk to Dr Clancy - even the ALP Victoria state conference motion which was the result of 2 years hard work with many health professionals and seeks VIC Govt advocacy for antiviral nasal sprays VIRALEZE™ (Astodrimer sodium) Nasodine (povidone iodine - in the book) and Heparin under RPC trial 2025 couldn’t excite the MSM interest of ABC, Channel 9, Age/SMH etc as Mark Butler seems to be continue a love in with TGA. TGA continues its order that Australian IP addresses are blocked from accessing viraleze.co preventing legal personal importation scheme purchases.
📌try the weblink and see the flick over to Starpharma.com as IP block happens or use a VPN to see the real website.
The efforts to block VIRALEZE™ are beyond normal and for all the healthy under 70 yr olds with zero treatment options frankly criminal..
Meanwhile federal govt spent more than AUKUS on Trumps American big pharma PBS antiviral pills $2.7billion to April this year whilst preventing Australians from buying their own protection
Astodrimer sodium as nasal spray is patented until mid 2030
Approved as medical device class 1 from 2020 by 35 regulators including EU the expert in nano particles
Approval in Australia should be on paper for safety non absorbed MD Class1 but TGA labelled it as not “well established technology” because no other nasal spray uses Astodrimer sodium so it can’t be compared with anything like carrageenan / Vicks first defence both pre pandemic… so having the patent labels it novel and thus can’t qualify in the class 1 that 35 other regulators have no problem with
What happens now is interesting as Europe has new rules and Europea pd Notified Bodies have approved VIRALEZE™ re safety and performance and that it is non pharmacological under mandatory rules May 2025 making VIRALEZE™ only antiviral nasal spray that can make SARS-CoV-2 claim on package MDR CL2a. In November 2024 class2a became the appropriate category for VIRALEZE™ in Australia so they had to withdraw their prev class1 application and under new rules apply for class2a here too and to speed TGA processing “well established technology” is no longer required as proof as it is legislated that the EU certification of MDR class 2a is transferable as only proof needed for Australia for that class
Talk about using red tape delays to help Pfizer who just so happen to have fast track FDA listing for a replacement of Paxlovid PF-07817883 Ibuzatrelvir
Strange that Pfizer won the vax league table and the treatment league table.
I am sure it will be a fascinating, but also a chilling read Maryanne. I look forward to getting it.
Although I have not followed up on it, isn't there a belief that ex Australian cricketer Shane Warne's death might be related to a Covid jab? Didn't he die within a couple of days of getting a jab?
I don’t know what the truth is about Warne’s death. Some were adamant it was because of a booster he allegedly took two weeks before he died, while others said he wasn’t boosted. He was known to smoke, have a poor diet, and use recreational drugs, so I don’t know what the cause of death was.
Anything much in there on the topic of voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
In my personal experience doctors don’t seem to have much knowledge or interest in this vital ethical principle in medicine…
For years I’ve raised the trashing of voluntary informed consent for vaccination with AHPRA, with the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, with the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, with the Australian Medical Association, and medical insurers such as Avant, MDA National, MIPS, and TEGO.
All these organisations have a contemptuous attitude to the concerns of the public.
Will any of us ever get back to normal after the devastation of Covid and government coercion and mandates? The US is still grappling with it, and no one has been held accountable yet. The stories in Australia appear to be just as bad. RFKJr and President Trump are doing what they can to change what was done to Americans, but, except for a few losing their jobs, no one has paid the price for their actions.
No one in the US paid any price for their violations of human, medical,and constitutional rights. The medical industry has gone into hiding either from shame or arrogance. The legal and judicial system were fearful members of the laptop class that did not fulfill their supposed duty for protection of rights. The executive branch were lapdogs for public health. The legislative bodies have not fulfilled their oaths to the constitution and have not examined the violations. Public health saved no one. They increased misery and deaths in excess of the disease.
So true
Maryanne, I did buy the book. I haven’t finished it because sometimes I need to get away from it all and read a novel or some other such distraction. From the substack midwestern doctor, I watched a clip from 60 minutes on the swine flu in 1976, it’s was all the same obfuscation as now. It angers me that no diagnostic tests exist nor medical codes. Cancer rates are up worldwide but governments are side stepping that one too, they’re blaming it on everything else but the real cause. In their mind it can’t be due to the shots because of the amount of time gone by past the shot. I don’t know what the upshot of all of their denials is going to be, but in my mind it’s imperative we have diagnostics.
I get it—it can be exhausting, especially for those who have to relive the nightmare. Sometimes it’s healthy to step back.
And, with so many credentialed doctors, scientists and such how can they still be recommending these shots? Why aren’t they looking into it?
Why? if you "followed the science" without thinking and had to come to terms with the idea that you have hurt people with a medical intervention..why would you think about it?..The cognitive dissonance would be huge..Its best to not think, follow the herd and "move on"..
I agree with you. I also question what countries had to agree to when signing the shot contracts. Pharma had the huge advantage, they held countries over the barrel. The public were clamouring for them, sadly including me. We were promised two shots and the pandemic would be over, which put governments under a lot of pressure. No government knew anything about these shots that used this new technology, except for the manufacturers. Pharma ruled.
The National Citizens Inquiry testimonies also continue in Canada this month. Evidence from hundreds of people, all available for viewing on Rumble. Dr David Martin has the exposed the intellectual property pathways and just needs to find a justice system interested in trying the case. Only 1 provincial politician has showed up to testify. One.
That's why Albertans will be voting YES to separation from confederation. We don't need to be governed by corrupt idiots. Alberta Prosperity Project. A costed plan to become a new nation. The banana Republic of Canaduh is no longer required.
In an article published in Quadrant in January 2021 [1], Robert Clancy said:
QUOTE
...In Australia, every encouragement should support over 90% vaccination, with whatever of the available vaccines are available: dissention and argument over "false news" undermines this endeavour. In other words, though immunity with Covid19 vaccination appears to be neither complete nor durable, any chance of approaching "herd immunity" depends on a near 100% vaccination rate...
the Australian community need to get behind a "vaccine for us all" programme, if even the slightest chance of herd immunity is to be achieved.
END OF QUOTE
Were the millions of Australians, including children, who've now been injected, at serious risk of the group of common respiratory symptoms called 'COVID-19'?
The millions of Australians who have been injected under MANDATES, and the violation of valid voluntary informed consent - were they all at risk of 'COVID-19'?
How could Robert Clancy ever justify his call for a "near 100% vaccination rate" and "a "vaccine for us all" programme" using these experimental interventions? Former Health Minister Greg Hunt admitted in February 2021: "The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever..."[2]
With no valid voluntary informed consent!
What on earth motivated Robert Clancy to come out with his highly questionable 'advice' in January 2021?
References:
1. COVID-19: A realistic approach to community management. Quadrant Online, 17 January 202.
2. Interview with David Speers on ABC Insiders on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. 21 February 2021: https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-with-david-speers-on-abc-insiders-on-the-covid-19-vaccine-rollout
I don’t agree with Clancy’s earlier remarks about the vaccine, but over the intervening years his views shifted a lot- which I think is a good thing.
Maryanne, I am fed up with the likes of Clancy, Dalgleish, Malhotra, Campbell, and Ioannidis getting off the hook on this.
This is a MAJOR part of the story. These so-called 'experts' demanded people be vaccinated...They had no bloody idea what they were talking about!
And now it seems billions of people are injected around the world...WITH NO VALID VOLUNTARY INFORMED CONSENT!!!
This idea of 'experts'...it's got to be shot down in flames.
'Experts'!!! The damage these people have done!!!
Loads of them, all throughout the system...the blessed 'experts', they were beyond question, protected from criticism, and people like me, who dared to question, were shut down.
I challenged Robert Clancy about that January 2021 Quadrant article on an email group in February 2023, and apart from a couple of people, I didn't get much in the way of support from others on that list, many of whom were doctors who were probably appalled that a mere peasant was challenging 'the great professor'. It was a pure fluke I was on that list at all, certainly not on it now.
Same with Angus Dalgleish - when I raise the atrocious July 2021 Daily Mail article people are so dazzled by his professor/oncologist status, they're willing to forgive any transgression...such as him demanding millions of young people submit to the jabs...
Honestly, it makes me sick!
I've been challenging 'experts' for years, including your mates Gotzsche and Jefferson about that rubbish LID aluminium and vaccine safety review by 'Cochrane Vaccines Field authors' (also relevant to HPV vaccination), and I wouldn't give you tuppence ha'penny for the lot of them.
Where were they when it counted? Would you care to guess how many 'experts' have supported me publicly re my quest for valid voluntary informed consent?
And here I will give Angus Dalgleish his due, because he did speak out publicly for me on the thread with BMJ editor in chief Kamran Abbasi, saying "I write in total support of Elizabeth Hart" in response to my email about informed consent and mandates, but Dalgleish's statement supporting me was subsequently erased by The Daily Sceptic and The Conservative Woman stories, which of course focussed on the cancer angle, but overlooked the also vital issue of informed consent/mandates.
See this email thread with my response to Dalgleish...and note all the people copied on it: Covid jabs, informed consent, indemnity, and medical ethics... Response to Gus
Dalgleish, 3 December 2022: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/covid-jabs-informed-consent-indemnity-and-medical-ethics...-response-to-gus-dalgleish.pdf
(Note this was the email I sent to him before I discovered his terrible July 2021 Daily Mail article...)
I suggest you read my email thread with Angus Dalgleish very carefully Maryanne, because this trashing of informed consent fiasco has to break some time, it's way past time for the shit to hit the fan. Really Maryanne, check it out, there is dynamite in there, particularly about the practitioners being led to believe they had liability protection for giving the jabs...but the situation is going to get very interesting if they didn't get authentic valid consent for administering the injections under mandates.
Elizabeth I agree with you but I disagree on your fighting strategy. If these “experts” were the tip of the spear for the enemy in the beginning, I have no problem thrusting that back into the heart of the enemy now. It’s basic martial arts.
I don’t have the knowledge, language, or eloquence that these guys do. They’re now working for us and hating them isn’t going to make my life any better.
Well we’ll have to agree to disagree kolya.
If there hadn’t been an army of willing ‘experts’ demanding the public submit to the worse than useless vaccines we wouldn’t be in this mess.
For them to come out now, after reportedly billions of doses have been injected in arms, and claim to be saviours, it is blatantly dishonest.
For their previous collaboration in this scandal to be brushed aside as if it doesn’t matter is just wrong.
In July 2021, the Daily Mail published an article apparently authored by Angus Dalgleish, titled: What every young person who fears the jab MUST be told: Vaccine expert ANGUS DALGLEISH dismantles beliefs that have seen rates stall among the 18-30s: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9815821/What-young-people-told-Vaccine-expert-ANGUS-DALGLEISH-dismantles-beliefs-18-30s.html
This was a crucial time when the population was under tremendous pressure to submit to vaccination, and when vaccine mandates were coming in Australia.
What on earth was going on with people such as Dalgleish and Robert Clancy (see my previous comment), and others such as Aseem Malhotra and John Campbell, that they would come out so aggressively pressing these products?! Did they have a clue what they were talking about?!
Its incredible.
I was flabbergasted when I came across that July 2021 Daily Mail article featuring Angus Dalgleish.
In November 2022, Dalgleish had publicly spoken up to support me on an email thread including key people (including Robert Clancy), primarily addressed to Kamran Abbasi, editor in chief of The BMJ. It was gutting to subsequently discover Dalgleish had previously been such a strident promoter of the COVID-19 vaccination for young people.
Here's the email I forwarded to him in January 2023, again cc'd to the key group: Health practitioners, Covid jabs and 'valid informed consent' - a medical ethics disaster. Response to Gus Dalgleish: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/re_-health-practitioners-covid-jabs-and-valid-informed-consent-a-medical-ethics-disaster.-response-to-gus-dalgleish.pdf
Now people such as Dalgleish and Clancy are speaking out...after billions of people have been injected - without valid voluntary informed consent!
Yet how do they explain their complicity in the launching of this coercive vaccination plan, which is now brushed away under the carpet, covered up...
This must be all out in the open now, how this deliberately manufactured 'crisis' unfolded, using so-called 'experts' to press the vaccine products on the population.
There must be transparency and accountability to make sure this never happens again.
A lot of people had that awakening moment during Covid. I’ll be the first to admit that I once supported the Gardasil vaccine, until I took a closer look at the data. Everyone goes through that “journey of discovery” in their own time, which is why your work is so important, Elizabeth—it keeps the issue of informed consent alive rather than letting it fade into the background.
It's been years Maryanne...YEARS!!!!!
For years, I've been flagging practitioners' obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent!!!
And here we are, millions of people injected under mandates and there is NO VALID CONSENT!!!
When is anyone going to wake up to this?!?!?!
There is NO VALID CONSENT for vaccination under coercion and mandates, it's not possible.
Massive scandal!!!
And people can't say they weren't warned...over and over and over again...
I have been following your work Elizabeth and so admire your tenacity to get to the bottom of this utterly disgusting debacle and the lack of informed consent. So surprised about Clancy, he certainly changed his tune since earlier days of pushing the jab. I wonder do you read Sasha Latypova on Substack at all? She and legal sleuth Katherine Watt have researched laws in the US which do not allow for informed consent, because the products were developed as countermeasures to bioterrorism under Dept of Defence. I believe everyone in power or of influence were required to push these products knowing they would kill and injure.
Yes Diane, I'm sick and tired of hearing about Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt...
I think they are wrong, and that the PREP Act DOES NOT protect vaccinators if they have not obtained valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination. See my email to Robert Kennedy: The PREP Act - requesting clarification re criminal liability for administrators of medical countermeasures: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/the-prep-act-requesting-clarification-re-criminal-liability-for-administrators-of-medical-countermeasures.pdf
Also see my recent email to Kennedy: There's no valid consent for vaccination under mandates...threats, pressure, coercion, manipulation, incentivisation, mis/disinformation... https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/theres-no-valid-consent-for-vaccination
If you're following my work you should know I have correspondence from the Australian Government and AHPRA confirming that vaccinating practitioners have an obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination...and this cannot be done under pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES!
This has now been on the record for years, and apparently studiously ignored by key figures in the so-called 'Freedom Movement'...who seem to dominate the narrative.
Sorry to sound terse, but this is really getting serious now, the persistent resistance to acknowledging the requirement for valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, I have certainly had little or no support on this matter from the medical 'profession'...and no wonder... Because I suggest there is NO VALID CONSENT under pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES.
For a summary of information, see my 11,000 word paper that covers much detail: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
Bravo to all involved in the production of this book. A very noble and humane motive. Applause for your efforts 👏
(Can I get my copy "autographed" ? 😊)
That's a lot of autographs for one book....! ;-)
"Auto-Pen"... 🔏
😂
Pity they remained BLIND to the Australian antiviral nasal spray VIRALEZE™ using Astodrimer sodium dendrimer by CSIRO which Morrison is probably implicated in killing even though it was MRFF BTB award winner. How can any authors on this topic miss this out. Europe re-approved it under new 2025 MDR Class2a but Australian 4 years after are denied prophylactic and TREATMENT with better efficacy in standard risk vaxed than Paxlovid. Surely it warranted a mention in this book although maybe all those health professional authors are scared of being fined by TGA themselves for infringing / RESTRICTED REPRESENTATIONS
We use a nebuliser with peroxide and saline occasionally these days.
Good point.
Early on, I was using nitric oxide/saline solutions etc to interfere with viral interactions in the nasal cavity/ACE2 receptors etc...
MaryAnne this is such an opportunity missed - with authors missing one of the worst Australians killings of its own inventions in the pandemic
So - Let down again - even the critics of the Australian responses seem muzzled or maybe the censorship has been so strong that no-one will step out with truth
I bought this book Maryanne faintly expecting (hoping❓) there would be mention of a victim of TGA INFRINGEMENT NOTICES - the Astodrimer sodium antiviral nasal spray VIRALEZE with proven RPC efficacy as early COVID treatment - developed from CSIRO DENDRIMERS
see VIRALEZE™ credentials below.
No mention in this book at all when TGA on 2 July 2021 STRANGLED AN MRFF BTB GOVT AWARD WINNING AUSTRALIAN NASAL SPRAY SAFE WITH COVID STATISTICAL EFFICACY https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/starpharma-holdings-limited-fined-93240-alleged-unlawful-advertising-viraleze-relation-covid-19
📌📌📌
Viraleze credentials
1️⃣ Viraleze antiviral nasal sprays by Starpharma 2022 Award by Australian Government dept of health and dept of industry
Starpharma awarded $1 million in matched funding by the Australian Government’s Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Biomedical Translation Bridge (BTB) Program to expedite development and commercialisation of VIRALEZE
Winner “Most significant commercial outcome”. DOHAC winner 13 months after TGA (also in DOHAC) irrationally banned & fined product info in Australia despite 35 regulators internationally including European EMA in 2020 approving as Medical Device
https://biotechdispatch.com.au/news/starpharma-wins-recognition-for-development-of-covid-19-antivira#:~:text=Starpharma%20was%20selected%20by%20an,development%20and%20commercialisation%20of%20VIRALEZE.
2️⃣ Sept 2024 - Astodrimer Sodium Nasal Spray versus Placebo in Non-Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/16/9/1173
PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATION
3️⃣ January 2024 Covid19 viral load post market study placebo based ASX announcement Jan 2024
https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02766071-3A635280&v=fc9bdb61fe50ea61f8225e24ce041a0e155a9400
4️⃣ June 2022 Astodrimer sodium human v placebo safety trials reported https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361382162_Astodrimer_sodium_antiviral_nasal_spray_for_reducing_respiratory_infections_is_safe_and_well_tolerated_in_a_randomized_controlled_trial
5️⃣ 2021 Scripp Research Institute in-vito and in-vivo humanised mouse genome Astodrimer sodium studies
https://www.scripps.edu/gallay/sars-cov-2.html
6️⃣ Sept 2024 Astodrimer sodium nasal spray forms a barrier to SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and preserves normal mucociliary function in human nasal epithelium
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-72262-w
7️⃣ Dec 2022 DART conference Astodrimer sodium v other nasal sprays Scripp presentation. In-viva (mouse model) euthanised to study viral load nasal cavity trachea and lung at 4 and 7 days. Comparators nitric oxide, HPMC, heparin, iota-carrageenan, Astodrimer sodium (Viraleze) v saline (PBS)
https://starpharma.com/assets/221201-respidart-poster.pdf
Other publications
Nasal delivery as a strategy for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19
See 3.2. Astodrimer sodium
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17425247.2023.2263363#d1e823
Victorian State Government report by KPMG January 2021
The research presented in this paper was commissioned by Victoria’s Lead Scientist, Dr Amanda Caples, and the Victorian Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (DJPR
https://djsir.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1988532/Creating-a-Healthy-Future-Report.pdf
P5; 33
Starpharma, an ASX300 company located in Melbourne, has developed a novel antiviral nasal spray, VIRALEZE™, which inactivates more than 99.99 percent of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. VIRALEZE™ is a broad spectrum antiviral nasal spray and is virucidal against SARS-CoV-2 and works by blocking the spike proteins on the SARS-CoV-2 and preventing them from binding to host cells thus preventing infection. Starpharma is finalising regulatory documents and manufacturing product in preparation for launch which is planned for the first quarter of 2021. Apart from VIRALEZE™ being a Victorian discovery, critical antiviral testing of the spray was conducted at 360Biolabs at the height of the pandemic in March 2020. Had this testing not been available locally the rapid development of the product would have been significantly compromised. Starpharma was awarded
$1 million in MRFF funding to expedite development and commercialisation of VIRALEZE™
VIRALEZE™
European medical device regulations February 2025:
Earlier this month, Starpharma received certification for ViralezeTM under the new European Union (EU) Medical Device Regulations (MDR). Under the new EU MDR classifications, medical device manufacturers must demonstrate compliance with certain essential requirements and undergo a new conformity assessment process with a Europea pd Notified Body. Achieving EU MDR certification demonstrates that ViralezeTM and the research supporting the product meet the necessary safety and performance
❌❌❌
BUT SEEMS EVEN THOSE CRITICAL OF WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA IN THE PANDEMIC, LET MILLIONS OF OVER 12YR OLD AUSTRALIANS DOWN BY NOT EXPOSING THE DEAL MORRISON DID TO GET PFIZER MRNA VAX AND PAXLOVID ON 9 APRIL 2021 as long as the competition from VIRALEZE™ was killed
Povidone-iodine is all the book says any nasal spray - nothing VIRALEZE™, iota-carrageenan, nitric oxide
Plenty of mention of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine
“….Povidone-iodine (real-time meta-analysis 21 studies) is another simple safe addition to covid therapy regimens: in vitro it kills 99.99% of Covid-19 virus within 30 seconds, and can reduce transmission of infection within an outbreak, with more rapid viral clearance, though clinical benefit is less clear. Covid-19 infection typically starts in the upper respiratory tract and specifically the nasal respiratory epithelium. The primary initial route for entry into the central nervous system is thought to be the olfactory nerve in the nasal cavity. Minimising early replication in the upper respiratory tract may reduce spread within neural tissues. Early or prophylactic nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal treatment can avoid the consequences of viral replication, though the extent of clinical benefits for the individual requires further study.
In conclusion, it appears that for treatment of Covid-19, clinicalobservational studies published by clinicians often include many drugs claiming impressive results such as 90% reduction of serious outcomes, particularly when subjects with risk factors are selected and treatment begins early. It is less clear which combination is optimal. Hydroxychloroquine and/or ivermectin are generally the base therapy, with the useful addition of easily obtained drugs s as
vitamin D and zinc. Povidine-iodine used as a throat gargle and for hasall irrigation reduces viral transmission by reducing viral load and persistence infected individuals….”
Would have been great if Prof Clancy had included this from someone who had studied it… like you!!
Would like to talk to Dr Clancy - even the ALP Victoria state conference motion which was the result of 2 years hard work with many health professionals and seeks VIC Govt advocacy for antiviral nasal sprays VIRALEZE™ (Astodrimer sodium) Nasodine (povidone iodine - in the book) and Heparin under RPC trial 2025 couldn’t excite the MSM interest of ABC, Channel 9, Age/SMH etc as Mark Butler seems to be continue a love in with TGA. TGA continues its order that Australian IP addresses are blocked from accessing viraleze.co preventing legal personal importation scheme purchases.
📌try the weblink and see the flick over to Starpharma.com as IP block happens or use a VPN to see the real website.
The efforts to block VIRALEZE™ are beyond normal and for all the healthy under 70 yr olds with zero treatment options frankly criminal..
Meanwhile federal govt spent more than AUKUS on Trumps American big pharma PBS antiviral pills $2.7billion to April this year whilst preventing Australians from buying their own protection
Emailed you details.
Btw my research unveiled an interesting Catch 22
Astodrimer sodium as nasal spray is patented until mid 2030
Approved as medical device class 1 from 2020 by 35 regulators including EU the expert in nano particles
Approval in Australia should be on paper for safety non absorbed MD Class1 but TGA labelled it as not “well established technology” because no other nasal spray uses Astodrimer sodium so it can’t be compared with anything like carrageenan / Vicks first defence both pre pandemic… so having the patent labels it novel and thus can’t qualify in the class 1 that 35 other regulators have no problem with
What happens now is interesting as Europe has new rules and Europea pd Notified Bodies have approved VIRALEZE™ re safety and performance and that it is non pharmacological under mandatory rules May 2025 making VIRALEZE™ only antiviral nasal spray that can make SARS-CoV-2 claim on package MDR CL2a. In November 2024 class2a became the appropriate category for VIRALEZE™ in Australia so they had to withdraw their prev class1 application and under new rules apply for class2a here too and to speed TGA processing “well established technology” is no longer required as proof as it is legislated that the EU certification of MDR class 2a is transferable as only proof needed for Australia for that class
Talk about using red tape delays to help Pfizer who just so happen to have fast track FDA listing for a replacement of Paxlovid PF-07817883 Ibuzatrelvir
Strange that Pfizer won the vax league table and the treatment league table.
I am sure it will be a fascinating, but also a chilling read Maryanne. I look forward to getting it.
Although I have not followed up on it, isn't there a belief that ex Australian cricketer Shane Warne's death might be related to a Covid jab? Didn't he die within a couple of days of getting a jab?
I don’t know what the truth is about Warne’s death. Some were adamant it was because of a booster he allegedly took two weeks before he died, while others said he wasn’t boosted. He was known to smoke, have a poor diet, and use recreational drugs, so I don’t know what the cause of death was.
Willbuy a couple of copies. One will go for my useless federal member, ex journalist, who literally has no idea.
The other goes to my Leftist friend in the US. Pete is a lovely guy but gets all his news from NPR, our ABC and CNN...
Hahah, we all have one of those friends 😂
Anything much in there on the topic of voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
In my personal experience doctors don’t seem to have much knowledge or interest in this vital ethical principle in medicine…
For years I’ve raised the trashing of voluntary informed consent for vaccination with AHPRA, with the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, with the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, with the Australian Medical Association, and medical insurers such as Avant, MDA National, MIPS, and TEGO.
All these organisations have a contemptuous attitude to the concerns of the public.
I’m now bring the matter right up to an individual doctor, see my article with our correspondence: "We take informed consent very seriously." A doctor https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/we-take-informed-consent-very-seriously
On the off-chance there are any doctors out there who are interested in the ethical and legal obligation for voluntary informed consent for vaccination, here's my 11,000 word paper that covers much detail: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
Page 19 in chapter one made me think
Muzzled not masked - a profession controlled by national cabinet secrets
https://x.com/charmsyahoo/status/1973247533964235185?s=46&t=yzt5Md7IJdL43uvNcxI5OA