7 Comments
User's avatar
Dr. K's avatar

Maryanne, Not unexpectedly, the best pithy summary of the facts (which are awful) across the 100 articles on spikeshots/pregnancy I have read over the past few days. Kudos. R

Elizabeth Hart's avatar

How could anyone give ‘voluntary informed consent’ to this medical intervention given the litany of lies about ‘Covid’ and the vaccines, and the coercion under threat of penalty, eg loss of livelihood, to make people comply?

That’s the scandal that still awaits the spotlight.

See for example my recent article showing the Police Commissioner of South Australia’s involvement in mandating vaccination - this happened in a supposed ‘free country’…

"I think there will be an incentive for people to get vaccinated if they want to fully participate in all the activities we normally enjoy." https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/i-think-there-will-be-an-incentive

Michael Lardelli's avatar

Thanks for the concise history.

JB watching TV's avatar

Filthy Fraudulent Foul Feckless Fake Fibber Faustian FlimFlam Foolish Fooey fauci

😱🤢🤮🤬💩

A Fun-Ghoul

(if you know you KNOW) 🤭

Brian Finney's avatar

Biss could see the problem what I would like to see is the mechanism proposed by the alternative and censored professional, at the time.

Most of the issues with mRNA were predicted by the alternative and censored. Was this? Quite apart from the crass stupidity of giving a pregnant woman a novel gene therapy

The science I trust, the people I don't

VictorDianne Watson's avatar

This is so criminal!! Some pregnant women were mandated to take shots that they were told were safe. Most mothers are so careful to avoid doing anything that could cause harm to their baby that this is just unbelievably abhorrent. Thank you for reporting in your thorough and clear way, Maryanne.