Nearly 2% of V-SAFE participants reported health deterioration lasting at least three months, which they attributed to Covid vaccination. The CDC has yet to investigate.
I’m assuming since this is a person specific cell phone App no deaths would be reported as one would be unable to do so… So we don’t have that potential severe reaction option.
One could check life status of all enrolled participants.
A 1% prolonged and severe reaction to the shots is higher than the death rate from Covid.
I would be curious to hear of follow up on the 1% to see how they are currently faring as well as the other group that did not suspect shot correlation. (If I interpreted that properly)
I am very grateful for the handful of persons who are dedicated to uncovering the hidden scientific facts here. Thank you Mr. Levi, you have my highest regards. And Maryanne, you are our reporting angel of truth.
It’s almost as if V-Safe was set up to look for issues, but when issues were found, the three letter agencies ignored the findings as they did not go along with their narrative.
I wonder how much of this is ignorance, arrogance, corruption, CYA, or greed?
Out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT what it thought about your article and the study you cite, and here is its "Overall judgment":
"I would characterize this as a credible and important signal-detection study, but not an incidence or causation study.
The responsible interpretation is:
Approximately 1.87% of V-safe enrollees reported prolonged health deterioration that they attributed to COVID vaccination. The number, persistence, functional consequences and reported rechallenge patterns make these reports worthy of urgent, independent clinical investigation.
The interpretation that goes too far would be:
The study proves that COVID vaccines caused chronic injury or disability in 1.87%—or approximately 1%—of everyone vaccinated.
(NOTE: It provided great detail about the study, and its bottomline statement was: "This is an important and potentially troubling analysis of the CDC’s V-safe data."
The most upsetting aspect of all this is that the CDC had the infrastructure in place to follow up on reports in real time and call participants—but it never did. Just another example of how the agency abandoned the vaccine-injured.
As a firefighter, I was one of the first to take the Phizer shot on 12/23/20 because I wanted to avoid potential infection before my appendix was removed. About a week after my 2nd shot (surgery just a couple days later), I had DVT in both calves followed by pulmonary embolisms in my lungs (3-day hospital stay).. At the time, I thought it was a complication of the surgery (although my surgeon was surprised since I had no risk factors). I didn't mention it in my early V-Safe reporting, since I was only asked to mention medical issues that I thought were related to the shot.
A year later, after "doing my own research," I realized that my DVT/PE was a common vaccine injury and reported it to V-Safe in my final 1-year check-in. V-Safe''s response was to leave me a voice mail and asked me to fill out a VAERS report. They never called again for follow-up, even though I was hospitalized. At least they called once ...
However, I recall from reading the V-Safe free texts reports (see ICAN's website https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/ ) that many people reporting serious adverse events (including death) were not getting any follow-up calls during the first months of the vaccine roll-out,
Another illuminative article from Doc MaDem. 👏
Shining the torch of truth where other "journos" don't know where to look! 🔦
A synergy of substance, style and sharp scrutiny 🤓
I’m assuming since this is a person specific cell phone App no deaths would be reported as one would be unable to do so… So we don’t have that potential severe reaction option.
One could check life status of all enrolled participants.
Exactly. Dead people don’t respond to surveys - and CDC never bothered to follow up 😞
A 1% prolonged and severe reaction to the shots is higher than the death rate from Covid.
I would be curious to hear of follow up on the 1% to see how they are currently faring as well as the other group that did not suspect shot correlation. (If I interpreted that properly)
I am very grateful for the handful of persons who are dedicated to uncovering the hidden scientific facts here. Thank you Mr. Levi, you have my highest regards. And Maryanne, you are our reporting angel of truth.
08/25/26: "The CDC has yet to investigate." And they never will.
A formal CDC investigation? Good.
A formal investigation into the CDC? Better.
A formal dismantling of the CDC as it is currently structured? Best.
It’s almost as if V-Safe was set up to look for issues, but when issues were found, the three letter agencies ignored the findings as they did not go along with their narrative.
I wonder how much of this is ignorance, arrogance, corruption, CYA, or greed?
08/25/26: Corruption. They're too greedy to be ignorant.
Out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT what it thought about your article and the study you cite, and here is its "Overall judgment":
"I would characterize this as a credible and important signal-detection study, but not an incidence or causation study.
The responsible interpretation is:
Approximately 1.87% of V-safe enrollees reported prolonged health deterioration that they attributed to COVID vaccination. The number, persistence, functional consequences and reported rechallenge patterns make these reports worthy of urgent, independent clinical investigation.
The interpretation that goes too far would be:
The study proves that COVID vaccines caused chronic injury or disability in 1.87%—or approximately 1%—of everyone vaccinated.
(NOTE: It provided great detail about the study, and its bottomline statement was: "This is an important and potentially troubling analysis of the CDC’s V-safe data."
The most upsetting aspect of all this is that the CDC had the infrastructure in place to follow up on reports in real time and call participants—but it never did. Just another example of how the agency abandoned the vaccine-injured.
08/25/26: The "critical-mass" moment is when the CDC bootlickers see their house mortgage floating before they eyes, and then they remain silent.
As a firefighter, I was one of the first to take the Phizer shot on 12/23/20 because I wanted to avoid potential infection before my appendix was removed. About a week after my 2nd shot (surgery just a couple days later), I had DVT in both calves followed by pulmonary embolisms in my lungs (3-day hospital stay).. At the time, I thought it was a complication of the surgery (although my surgeon was surprised since I had no risk factors). I didn't mention it in my early V-Safe reporting, since I was only asked to mention medical issues that I thought were related to the shot.
A year later, after "doing my own research," I realized that my DVT/PE was a common vaccine injury and reported it to V-Safe in my final 1-year check-in. V-Safe''s response was to leave me a voice mail and asked me to fill out a VAERS report. They never called again for follow-up, even though I was hospitalized. At least they called once ...
However, I recall from reading the V-Safe free texts reports (see ICAN's website https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/ ) that many people reporting serious adverse events (including death) were not getting any follow-up calls during the first months of the vaccine roll-out,