Wilful blindness to protect the Red Cross reputation parallels TGA wilful blindness to protect major funder big pharma Pfizer
And the people must be reminded they cannot question these organisations because going to the media which is that 4th estate we can supposedly use has done a deal via TNI (40 strong MDM/SM international news cabal Trusted News initiate) to flag and not report on certain issues linked to vaccines and treatments and goodness help us even prevention.
So if blood products are questionable in quality then would a blood transfusion give a vulnerable patient like my alcoholic son with a failed liver, Covid? He was in hospital and they decided to treat him even though he was terminal and he suddenly had covid with no symptoms. This post is very disturbing. My son has since passed away but I did wonder where the covid came from when he was isolated in a single room in a ward.
As for the Red Cross. I never donate to them anymore. Such a tainted organisation. Why are they allowed to handle blood products?
Red Cross says there have been no cases of covid infection via blood transfusion. I think its low risk with respiratory infections but I don't know what happened in your son's case. Sorry for your loss Jillian. xx
A good friend of ours used to work at the Blood Bank and I was horrified when she had said people could donate within days of the jab. This was in 2022.
At the time it was clear the jab did not stay in the injection area, and studies were appearing showing spike protein being around for months.
I lodged a formal complaint with the Blood Bank and it was utterly laughable (well not really it was disgusting) how they claimed there were no issues and that they followed govt advice.
I spoke with them twice pointing out actual studoes and the serious risks, but they continued to hide behind the "govt advice" excuse.
Lifeblood need to immediately segregate vaxxed and unvaxxed blood and I would argue need to be testing the vaxxed before donation for the spike protein. But that would collapse donation rates and force them to then do something....
Better apparently to keep lying, keep the head in the sand and pretend all is rosy. This will kill untold nos of people, like your son. These people are death worshippers and evil.
My understanding is that although a charity the Blood Banks sells donated blood overseas to enable it's overheads to be paid and I'm sure those in upper management are well compensated.
Yes, there I am told there are profit motives associated with the importing and selling of blood products between the Red Cross and CSL - these are commercial entities.
I heard they were bringing in a new medical consultant at the blood bank. A slightly BATTY chap by the name of Dr Acula. Just don't take him to Italian restaurants, he won't go anywhere near garlic bread. Also needs SPF 1,000,000 for sun screen !
Do you know how long after the individuals were vaccinated their blood samples were taken?
Has anyone anywhere in the world - beside Chakraborty - analysed the blood or tissues of vaccinated individuals for presence of foreign DNA, especially longitudinally?
Has a single blood product anywhere in the world been tested?
The original blood samples were taken before, and between 1 and 7 days after vaccinated…. It varied for each sample - all 75 samples from SA participants who took Pfizer or Moderna, had these gene sequences…. I don’t know what would have happened if they waited longer post vaccination…. I’m pretty sure the blood banks aren’t looking/testing.
Is there a similar explanation for some mothers who have/had to take the pregnancy Anti-D shot (plasma-based), such that we're not panicking people unnecessarily?
I’m not sure what that anti-D shot is, Rob. I was told that it’s more likely these foreign gene sequences end up in plasma-based products or nucleated cells…. The levels - and potential health risks - are unknown and to my knowledge, no one is investigating it….
MD follows up her winning point on her Part 1 investigation with this Part 2 ACE she serves up with sizzling style. Spot on with the questions and fired up with facts, just another superb article that covers the court with class and real journalism. (Methinks I'm watching too much Aus Open 🤔🎾🖥)
BREAKING: Japanese Press Conference Reveals High Death Rates Among Young People, Confirms Vaccinated Individuals More Susceptible to Infection!
"Many are dying at home. There are people who died the day after getting vaccinated. There are multiple cases of this happening. And there are scattered cases of people dying within a week of Vax!"…”
[FULL ENGLISH SUBBED PRESS CONFERENCE AT THE END OF ARTICLE]
This week, on January 16th, 2025, the Vaccine Issues Research Group hosted a press conference in Japan, unveiling serious concerns about mRNA lipid nanoparticles and genetic therapies.
Spearheaded by Emeritus Professor Dr. Masanori Fukushima of Kyoto University, the conference began with him emphasizing a glaring regulatory oversight: preclinical animal testing safety data for vaccines remain astonishingly basic compared to ordinary pharmaceuticals. In cases of typical drug development, detailed tests are conducted on drug distribution, potential carcinogenic effects, and reproductive impacts. However, for vaccines, these stringent evaluations are notably absent.
For ordinary pharmaceuticals, it is determined how they distribute within the body. This is followed by tests for whether they cause cancer, and whether they affect reproductive functions. All these detailed and extensive experiments are required, but when it comes to vaccines, these requirements are not enforced at all.
One thing that nobody has ever explained to me, nor have I seen any discussions regarding, when the issue of "vaccines" is discussed, is the relevance of the recipient's blood type.
As we know, blood type O is the universal donor, as it does not have any pertinent antigens within it. Similarly, blood type AB is the universal recipient as it has both type A and type B antigens within it.
We also know that the reason someone with blood type B cannot donate to someone with blood type A is due to the effect the presence of the B antigen will have on the immune system of the blood type A recipient. Similarly we know that blood type A can donate to a recipient who is either type A or type AB, but not to type B or O. Again, we know that type B can donate to a recipient who is type B or type AB, but not type A or O.
Although I am not a phlebotomist, there is a not unnatural presumption that a "one size fits all" roll out of vaccinations may well have a different effect on the recipient, depending on the blood type of that recipient. Clearly, if the "vaccine" is manufactured to be effectively a "type O" type of vaccine, then assuming the same principle of blood, it should be able to be received by every blood type. If anyone can assist my ignorance on this particular matter, one I have cogitated over, for years, it would be appreciated.
The above being said, and from the disturbing lack of quantifiable evidence recorded in regards to the vaccination status of a blood donor, it would not be unreasonable for those of us, who were wise enough never to receive, even a single vaccine, to be able to be assured, that in the unfortunate situation that we require a blood transfusion, the blood donated is from a non vaccinated person.
However, being awake to the manner by which everything seems to be brushed under the carpet, in regards to many medical issues, it is not surprising that there are no adequate records in the Australian system in relation to the status of the blood donor. Ignorance is therefore created, that facilitates the shrugging of the shoulders approach, of "well we don't know, so we can't say, but here it is, take it or leave it!"
quote "Peri-operative blood transfusions carry lower risk, as they are almost exclusively composed of packed red blood cells, which lack a nucleus and therefore cannot produce spike protein ...."
It is not clear to me why the lack of nucleus prevents spike protein production. In the undisturbed case, the nucleus makes mRNA in order to produce normal proteins. However in the jabbed case, the injected mRNA takes the place of the nuclear-produced mRNA and thus can interact directly with the ribosomes to make spike proteins. I'm not a biologist so maybe i missed something?
Wilful blindness to protect the Red Cross reputation parallels TGA wilful blindness to protect major funder big pharma Pfizer
And the people must be reminded they cannot question these organisations because going to the media which is that 4th estate we can supposedly use has done a deal via TNI (40 strong MDM/SM international news cabal Trusted News initiate) to flag and not report on certain issues linked to vaccines and treatments and goodness help us even prevention.
BRAVE AND HONEST REPORTING AGAIN MaryAnne thanks…
Thanks Mary
So if blood products are questionable in quality then would a blood transfusion give a vulnerable patient like my alcoholic son with a failed liver, Covid? He was in hospital and they decided to treat him even though he was terminal and he suddenly had covid with no symptoms. This post is very disturbing. My son has since passed away but I did wonder where the covid came from when he was isolated in a single room in a ward.
As for the Red Cross. I never donate to them anymore. Such a tainted organisation. Why are they allowed to handle blood products?
Red Cross says there have been no cases of covid infection via blood transfusion. I think its low risk with respiratory infections but I don't know what happened in your son's case. Sorry for your loss Jillian. xx
Jillian. Very sad to hear of your sons passing.
A good friend of ours used to work at the Blood Bank and I was horrified when she had said people could donate within days of the jab. This was in 2022.
At the time it was clear the jab did not stay in the injection area, and studies were appearing showing spike protein being around for months.
I lodged a formal complaint with the Blood Bank and it was utterly laughable (well not really it was disgusting) how they claimed there were no issues and that they followed govt advice.
I spoke with them twice pointing out actual studoes and the serious risks, but they continued to hide behind the "govt advice" excuse.
Lifeblood need to immediately segregate vaxxed and unvaxxed blood and I would argue need to be testing the vaxxed before donation for the spike protein. But that would collapse donation rates and force them to then do something....
Better apparently to keep lying, keep the head in the sand and pretend all is rosy. This will kill untold nos of people, like your son. These people are death worshippers and evil.
My understanding is that although a charity the Blood Banks sells donated blood overseas to enable it's overheads to be paid and I'm sure those in upper management are well compensated.
Yes, there I am told there are profit motives associated with the importing and selling of blood products between the Red Cross and CSL - these are commercial entities.
🙏 Maryanne another interesting article
A few years ago I was disturbed to hear first class airfares for execs not just business and then there is virement of designated funds
I heard they were bringing in a new medical consultant at the blood bank. A slightly BATTY chap by the name of Dr Acula. Just don't take him to Italian restaurants, he won't go anywhere near garlic bread. Also needs SPF 1,000,000 for sun screen !
🙊
Do you know how long after the individuals were vaccinated their blood samples were taken?
Has anyone anywhere in the world - beside Chakraborty - analysed the blood or tissues of vaccinated individuals for presence of foreign DNA, especially longitudinally?
Has a single blood product anywhere in the world been tested?
I thought scientists were a curious bunch
The original blood samples were taken before, and between 1 and 7 days after vaccinated…. It varied for each sample - all 75 samples from SA participants who took Pfizer or Moderna, had these gene sequences…. I don’t know what would have happened if they waited longer post vaccination…. I’m pretty sure the blood banks aren’t looking/testing.
"Peri-operative blood transfusions carry lower risk"
Is there a similar explanation for some mothers who have/had to take the pregnancy Anti-D shot (plasma-based), such that we're not panicking people unnecessarily?
I’m not sure what that anti-D shot is, Rob. I was told that it’s more likely these foreign gene sequences end up in plasma-based products or nucleated cells…. The levels - and potential health risks - are unknown and to my knowledge, no one is investigating it….
MD follows up her winning point on her Part 1 investigation with this Part 2 ACE she serves up with sizzling style. Spot on with the questions and fired up with facts, just another superb article that covers the court with class and real journalism. (Methinks I'm watching too much Aus Open 🤔🎾🖥)
Vaccines finally in focus
“
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
Highlights V2.mp4
Watch now
BREAKING: Japanese Press Conference Reveals High Death Rates Among Young People, Confirms Vaccinated Individuals More Susceptible to Infection!
"Many are dying at home. There are people who died the day after getting vaccinated. There are multiple cases of this happening. And there are scattered cases of people dying within a week of Vax!"…”
https://open.substack.com/pub/pharmafiles/p/breaking-japanese-press-conference?r=3bj1w6&utm_medium=ios
READ IN APP
[FULL ENGLISH SUBBED PRESS CONFERENCE AT THE END OF ARTICLE]
This week, on January 16th, 2025, the Vaccine Issues Research Group hosted a press conference in Japan, unveiling serious concerns about mRNA lipid nanoparticles and genetic therapies.
Spearheaded by Emeritus Professor Dr. Masanori Fukushima of Kyoto University, the conference began with him emphasizing a glaring regulatory oversight: preclinical animal testing safety data for vaccines remain astonishingly basic compared to ordinary pharmaceuticals. In cases of typical drug development, detailed tests are conducted on drug distribution, potential carcinogenic effects, and reproductive impacts. However, for vaccines, these stringent evaluations are notably absent.
For ordinary pharmaceuticals, it is determined how they distribute within the body. This is followed by tests for whether they cause cancer, and whether they affect reproductive functions. All these detailed and extensive experiments are required, but when it comes to vaccines, these requirements are not enforced at all.
Prof Masanori Fukushima, 16 Jan 2025
One thing that nobody has ever explained to me, nor have I seen any discussions regarding, when the issue of "vaccines" is discussed, is the relevance of the recipient's blood type.
As we know, blood type O is the universal donor, as it does not have any pertinent antigens within it. Similarly, blood type AB is the universal recipient as it has both type A and type B antigens within it.
We also know that the reason someone with blood type B cannot donate to someone with blood type A is due to the effect the presence of the B antigen will have on the immune system of the blood type A recipient. Similarly we know that blood type A can donate to a recipient who is either type A or type AB, but not to type B or O. Again, we know that type B can donate to a recipient who is type B or type AB, but not type A or O.
Although I am not a phlebotomist, there is a not unnatural presumption that a "one size fits all" roll out of vaccinations may well have a different effect on the recipient, depending on the blood type of that recipient. Clearly, if the "vaccine" is manufactured to be effectively a "type O" type of vaccine, then assuming the same principle of blood, it should be able to be received by every blood type. If anyone can assist my ignorance on this particular matter, one I have cogitated over, for years, it would be appreciated.
The above being said, and from the disturbing lack of quantifiable evidence recorded in regards to the vaccination status of a blood donor, it would not be unreasonable for those of us, who were wise enough never to receive, even a single vaccine, to be able to be assured, that in the unfortunate situation that we require a blood transfusion, the blood donated is from a non vaccinated person.
However, being awake to the manner by which everything seems to be brushed under the carpet, in regards to many medical issues, it is not surprising that there are no adequate records in the Australian system in relation to the status of the blood donor. Ignorance is therefore created, that facilitates the shrugging of the shoulders approach, of "well we don't know, so we can't say, but here it is, take it or leave it!"
Incompetence personified once again!
quote "Peri-operative blood transfusions carry lower risk, as they are almost exclusively composed of packed red blood cells, which lack a nucleus and therefore cannot produce spike protein ...."
It is not clear to me why the lack of nucleus prevents spike protein production. In the undisturbed case, the nucleus makes mRNA in order to produce normal proteins. However in the jabbed case, the injected mRNA takes the place of the nuclear-produced mRNA and thus can interact directly with the ribosomes to make spike proteins. I'm not a biologist so maybe i missed something?