The authors call mRNA vaccines safe, effective & transformative. But the review is largely performative. It raises controversial questions only to defuse them with reassuring conclusions.
Marianne, This is the best piece on that ridiculous "paper" I have seen. Hope your piece gets wide circulation. Hope you can encourage some of the bigger Substacks to reprint it. I shall prod them as well.
[The authors recognise myocarditis as a vaccine-associated adverse event and acknowledge that some patients continue to experience symptoms or imaging abnormalities more than twelve months later.]
So still "safe and effective" ? Where are all the Australian State and Federal Health Ministers, health bureaucrats, the likes of Norman Swan etc ??? Apologies forthcoming ?
The Lancet hits a new low. Like the title of the book, its new name should be "Science for Sale".
Ahh "The Lancet" !
...more material to line the cat litter box 🐈 🤣
This Lancet paper seems to be a perfect example of what can be described as a “limited hangout”.
Marianne, This is the best piece on that ridiculous "paper" I have seen. Hope your piece gets wide circulation. Hope you can encourage some of the bigger Substacks to reprint it. I shall prod them as well.
Yes, thank you Dr K. I will forward it to others.
[The authors recognise myocarditis as a vaccine-associated adverse event and acknowledge that some patients continue to experience symptoms or imaging abnormalities more than twelve months later.]
So still "safe and effective" ? Where are all the Australian State and Federal Health Ministers, health bureaucrats, the likes of Norman Swan etc ??? Apologies forthcoming ?