"Health officials told pregnant women the vaccines were safe—when no one had studied that claim in the first trimester. This new analysis suggests that serious harms may have been missed."
.. could be restated towards the end: "This analysis suggests that agencies like the TGA chose instead to risk fetal deaths, for ensuring higher vaccine uptake."
.. and somewhere add - "Unborn Babies, it can be inferred, were regarded as expendable"
.. and Retsef's: "The fact that pregnant women were recommended and even pushed to vaccinate during pregnancy without appropriate clinical trials was gross negligence"
.. legally, using the term 'negligence' is appropriate only when persons responsible for harm to others, can be shown on the facts to have failed to think or turn their minds towards possible adverse consequences or injuries or even death to others, as a result of their actions
.. here the responsible persons were the folks within the TGA, FDA, CDC, MHRA, Health Canada, and the EMA
.. now, the people who staff those agencies had, until Covid, placed the health and safety of pregnant women, and especially their unborn Babies, at the top of the list to protect in respect of any new products
.. point being, all those who staff those agencies have for decades long known unborn Babies can and are often especially vulnerable to new and exotic drugs, and have historically afforded absolute priority to pregnant Mums and their unborn Babies, in terms of safety and possible recommendations
.. so no one in those once disciplined agencies - all of them collectively, at once, globally - inadvertently 'forgot' to "think or turn their minds towards possible adverse consequences or injuries or even death to others, as a result of their actions" .. IE .. from making recommendations without any studies or facts in support .. no, they instead very intentionally lied, knowing they had broken with all prior safety protocols afforded Mums and unborn Babies
.. stated differently, these health agency folk threw pregnant Mums and their unborn Babies under the bus
so legally, there was no 'negligence' - instead, premeditated and intentional risk was taken in recommending these products to Mums .. recommendations as you point out, which had no basis in fact
that is by one common sense view straight out lying
. the law also calls this misrepresentation .. but here, misrepresentations knowingly made .. that levels the culpability right up for these agencies, well beyond the line of negligence, and into the legal landscape of negligent homicide, Involuntary Manslaughter, Criminal Recklessness / Reckless Endangerment, Fraud by False Representation (UK, US, AU), and Misconduct in Public Office for appearing to have satisfied the “serious abuse of public trust” threshold .. I kid you not .. one or more of these charges apply in the circumstances
this is not alarmist language, it is the law more clearly stated towards the circumstances and findings presented here, in the study by Guetzkow et al 2025
these charges are relevant, but just try finding a government employed police investigator or government employed Crown Prosecutor prepared to laid the required charges ..
.. otherwise, this is a very sad indictment upon the status quo of the misnomer: public health
“Journalist” have been scribes for public health. Here in America it is a rare media outlet that does not take pharma money. Professional skepticism and ethics were thrown out the window since most of the media were in the laptop class and were members of the fearleader team.
But many can’t get vaccinated today to protect themselves with unrealistic 12mths between boosts
Why is the media or TNI controlled media still not reporting anything that might cause VACCINE HESITANCY and in reality is causing failure to protect and treat with placebo based peer reviewed proven viral load reduction. A safe cheap easy antiviral nasal sprays every day could effectively with a SLIP SLOP SLAP type advertising campaign could have changed the entrenchment of COVID with no SERs that vaccines clearly have.
Where we recommend pregnant women regularly take iron supplements to avoid anaemia, spraying noses each morning before going out could have been as effective as having a vaccine in the first trimester
Agreed Maryanne! Proverbially under the bus! But justice must come for the injured! So many hurting people who thought they did the right thing. I believe a lot of people will think At least I surely hope common sense is back!!!
I could never have imagined the depth of ineptitude by our health agencies prior to getting the shot, it has shaken me to my core. I recall young women coming out in droves complaining that the shot had either stopped their periods or caused extremely heavy flows. Nobody seemed to be alarmed enough to look into this as a signal, instead MSM news pushed that there was no correlation to the shot. MSM has lost the ability to sniff out a story. They even aired clips of experts reiterating “not causal.” Ensuring pregnant women get the shot through heavy duty fear tactics based on no evidence was atrocious, murderous. All the pseudo science presented as evidence was criminal, there’s no other way to look at it. As I’ve mentioned before, my daughter in law got the shot whilst pregnant. Their second child is behind the curve both in walking and talking. She was hospitalized with RSV, had a large belly button hernia operated on. She does odd things repetitively. I’m sure people around the world are experiencing health issues that have arisen out of nowhere but there’s no way to connect it to the shot, meaning we have no ability in which to prove causality. Meanwhile, pharma is pumping out new shots using the mRNA technology to address non covid issues. No accountability just more profits at our expense.
Another angle here is that those "testing" the poisons known as Covid vaccines had completely the wrong mindset.
In medical trials you have to act as if there really may be a problem with this untested treatment, and rigourously check everything to guard against this. Thalidomide and other disasters should have drummed this into researchers minds.
But here, as is so common these days (and should not be) those testing are looking for every skerrick of evidence that they can use to somehow show the treatment works, and can be sold to make millions for the developer, rather than testing to also ensure that any side effects and adverse reactions are carefully reviewed and investigated. And if there are doubts, the treatment is not commercialised or goes back into development.
We have a moral crisis with Pharma. but RFK Jr and others are starting to push back, but here in Australia we have so many with no ethics or ability to critically think and few pushing back.
Dr. Scott Harris, Alabama’s State Health Officer, constantly pushed the narrative. He recommended pregnant women take the vaccine (August 2021) with no scientific data, no scientific studies, with no occurrence of full-term pregnancies, and with no understanding of the potential impact on the mother’s health, nor effects on developing babies. Historically, authorities banned several drugs with more scientific evidence than the COVID vaccine after general use. No drug is “safe and effective” nor an unalloyed good, but he condemned mothers and babies in pursuit of the narrative. And he was not alone in the cloistered world of public health.
thank you Dr Demasi,
.. if I may say, you and Retsef are too polite
"Health officials told pregnant women the vaccines were safe—when no one had studied that claim in the first trimester. This new analysis suggests that serious harms may have been missed."
.. could be restated towards the end: "This analysis suggests that agencies like the TGA chose instead to risk fetal deaths, for ensuring higher vaccine uptake."
.. and somewhere add - "Unborn Babies, it can be inferred, were regarded as expendable"
.. and Retsef's: "The fact that pregnant women were recommended and even pushed to vaccinate during pregnancy without appropriate clinical trials was gross negligence"
.. legally, using the term 'negligence' is appropriate only when persons responsible for harm to others, can be shown on the facts to have failed to think or turn their minds towards possible adverse consequences or injuries or even death to others, as a result of their actions
.. here the responsible persons were the folks within the TGA, FDA, CDC, MHRA, Health Canada, and the EMA
.. now, the people who staff those agencies had, until Covid, placed the health and safety of pregnant women, and especially their unborn Babies, at the top of the list to protect in respect of any new products
.. point being, all those who staff those agencies have for decades long known unborn Babies can and are often especially vulnerable to new and exotic drugs, and have historically afforded absolute priority to pregnant Mums and their unborn Babies, in terms of safety and possible recommendations
.. so no one in those once disciplined agencies - all of them collectively, at once, globally - inadvertently 'forgot' to "think or turn their minds towards possible adverse consequences or injuries or even death to others, as a result of their actions" .. IE .. from making recommendations without any studies or facts in support .. no, they instead very intentionally lied, knowing they had broken with all prior safety protocols afforded Mums and unborn Babies
.. stated differently, these health agency folk threw pregnant Mums and their unborn Babies under the bus
so legally, there was no 'negligence' - instead, premeditated and intentional risk was taken in recommending these products to Mums .. recommendations as you point out, which had no basis in fact
that is by one common sense view straight out lying
. the law also calls this misrepresentation .. but here, misrepresentations knowingly made .. that levels the culpability right up for these agencies, well beyond the line of negligence, and into the legal landscape of negligent homicide, Involuntary Manslaughter, Criminal Recklessness / Reckless Endangerment, Fraud by False Representation (UK, US, AU), and Misconduct in Public Office for appearing to have satisfied the “serious abuse of public trust” threshold .. I kid you not .. one or more of these charges apply in the circumstances
this is not alarmist language, it is the law more clearly stated towards the circumstances and findings presented here, in the study by Guetzkow et al 2025
these charges are relevant, but just try finding a government employed police investigator or government employed Crown Prosecutor prepared to laid the required charges ..
.. otherwise, this is a very sad indictment upon the status quo of the misnomer: public health
Journalists will be all over this for sure……
Oh that’s right..
Nothing can be printed that might cause “vaccine hesitancy”
“Journalist” have been scribes for public health. Here in America it is a rare media outlet that does not take pharma money. Professional skepticism and ethics were thrown out the window since most of the media were in the laptop class and were members of the fearleader team.
But many can’t get vaccinated today to protect themselves with unrealistic 12mths between boosts
Why is the media or TNI controlled media still not reporting anything that might cause VACCINE HESITANCY and in reality is causing failure to protect and treat with placebo based peer reviewed proven viral load reduction. A safe cheap easy antiviral nasal sprays every day could effectively with a SLIP SLOP SLAP type advertising campaign could have changed the entrenchment of COVID with no SERs that vaccines clearly have.
Where we recommend pregnant women regularly take iron supplements to avoid anaemia, spraying noses each morning before going out could have been as effective as having a vaccine in the first trimester
Time for justice. Throw the inventors of these jabs under the bus.
I reckon we throw the regulators under the bus…. It’s their job to make sure the jab’s are safe 😖
Agreed Maryanne! Proverbially under the bus! But justice must come for the injured! So many hurting people who thought they did the right thing. I believe a lot of people will think At least I surely hope common sense is back!!!
So for those women in the relevant early stages of pregnancy the relative risk increase of a miscarriage is over 40% ?
Yep 😞
I could never have imagined the depth of ineptitude by our health agencies prior to getting the shot, it has shaken me to my core. I recall young women coming out in droves complaining that the shot had either stopped their periods or caused extremely heavy flows. Nobody seemed to be alarmed enough to look into this as a signal, instead MSM news pushed that there was no correlation to the shot. MSM has lost the ability to sniff out a story. They even aired clips of experts reiterating “not causal.” Ensuring pregnant women get the shot through heavy duty fear tactics based on no evidence was atrocious, murderous. All the pseudo science presented as evidence was criminal, there’s no other way to look at it. As I’ve mentioned before, my daughter in law got the shot whilst pregnant. Their second child is behind the curve both in walking and talking. She was hospitalized with RSV, had a large belly button hernia operated on. She does odd things repetitively. I’m sure people around the world are experiencing health issues that have arisen out of nowhere but there’s no way to connect it to the shot, meaning we have no ability in which to prove causality. Meanwhile, pharma is pumping out new shots using the mRNA technology to address non covid issues. No accountability just more profits at our expense.
Maryanne
Another angle here is that those "testing" the poisons known as Covid vaccines had completely the wrong mindset.
In medical trials you have to act as if there really may be a problem with this untested treatment, and rigourously check everything to guard against this. Thalidomide and other disasters should have drummed this into researchers minds.
But here, as is so common these days (and should not be) those testing are looking for every skerrick of evidence that they can use to somehow show the treatment works, and can be sold to make millions for the developer, rather than testing to also ensure that any side effects and adverse reactions are carefully reviewed and investigated. And if there are doubts, the treatment is not commercialised or goes back into development.
We have a moral crisis with Pharma. but RFK Jr and others are starting to push back, but here in Australia we have so many with no ethics or ability to critically think and few pushing back.
Exactly. They begin with a premise that a product is safe until proven otherwise. It should be the other way around.
Time for regulator analysis, not big pharma commercial imperatives to approve with control of their own trials. This is so important
Dr. Scott Harris, Alabama’s State Health Officer, constantly pushed the narrative. He recommended pregnant women take the vaccine (August 2021) with no scientific data, no scientific studies, with no occurrence of full-term pregnancies, and with no understanding of the potential impact on the mother’s health, nor effects on developing babies. Historically, authorities banned several drugs with more scientific evidence than the COVID vaccine after general use. No drug is “safe and effective” nor an unalloyed good, but he condemned mothers and babies in pursuit of the narrative. And he was not alone in the cloistered world of public health.
We can only hope and pray so.