20 Comments

The TGA is shown as utterly incompetent. They need to be shut down and an objective investigation into the reckless decisions they have made on covid shots commenced.

Expand full comment

The incompetence is not confined to the TGA, unfortunately - most public agencies seem to operate with a mission of "dismiss and deny."

Expand full comment

A federal election coming up in the near future for Australia. This whole situation and the TGA's multitude of inconsistencies in their stated positions needs to be made an issue ! MD for PM 😁

Expand full comment

lol! PM is the last job I’d want 🤪

Expand full comment

I wonder how long this charade of denials from agencies around the world can go on? Instead of being proactive and planning for the eventual fallout they instead decide to stick their heads in the sand. It is so irresponsible.

Expand full comment

Another excellent disclosure, Maryanne. The silence from the TGA is no accident of incompetence—it reeks of something far more deliberate. At best, this is willful blindness; at worst, it's an orchestrated attempt to conceal an unforgivable breach of public trust. The real question is: why? Why are these individuals so openly complicit in covering up the blatant issues surrounding these toxic COVID injectable drugs? The public deserves answers, not silence.

Expand full comment

It’s all about

Wilful denial

By many players

TGA play a game…

Don’t respond

Wait for a group to organise to apply for FOI

Delay the FOI until all commercial in confidence has been redacted

Look for anything involving National Cabinet and say not to be disclosed for 20 years

Make sure if there is any product involved - 🤫 isn’t that what all ARTG listing involves TGA then can use RESTRICTED REPRESENTATIONS to silence medical and health professionals

TNI -members MSM SM flags anything not approved to NOT REPORT - pure censorship across international media

Expand full comment

Yep, that’s the cycle then send us on 😩

Expand full comment

Forgot

Colleges control registration of medical professionals and can de-register or re-educate

Expand full comment

One thing, amongst many, that is of concern, in relation to the level of the DNA contamination in the mRNA jabs that were produced by Big Pharma, is that there must have been protocols in place, pertinent to the acceptable levels of DNA allowed.

Further, those manufacturing such jabs, must have known the methodology and procedures necessary to expunge the DNA from the batches. Additionally, within their management protocols, they would have known if the necessary procedures to remove the DNA had been undertaken. If these procedures had been undertaken, one presumes that there would have been random tests taken, of each batch, to ascertain whether the level of DNA that remained was within allowable limits.

Assuming the above statement to be correct, then the following must be true.

1) Either, the jab manufacturers, deliberately omitted to undertake the necessary procedures to remove the excess DNA; or

2) they did attempt the removal of the DNA, but did not test to see, if their procedures had been adequate and successful.

If the answer relates to (1), then it condones the belief that these companies, arrogantly ignored the agreed protocols, so as maximise the productivity of the jab and thus optimise their profits.

If the answer relates to (2), then, effectively, one comes to the same conclusion.

Either way, the jab manufacturers were totally and utterly incompetent, and thus it causes one to question their right to be allowed to manufacture anything else moving forward. Or they care nothing for the health of the populous to whom they serve, as to do so stands in the way of their profits.

Again, either way, all of these manufacturers should have their relevant licences revoked, forthwith, and be sued for deliberate fraudulent acts, which I understand, is one of the only mechanisms, behind which these manufacturers cannot hide behind, when it comes to the production of "vaccines".

Expand full comment

The manufacturers cut corners under the guise of an “emergency,” while regulators remained oblivious and complacent. With liability protections in place, manufacturers had little incentive to prioritise safety, and the media largely abandoned its role in holding them to account. *sigh*

Expand full comment

Didn’t the Pfizer person call it the speed of science?

Expand full comment

Yeah, "We flew the aeroplane while we were still building it"

Expand full comment

One wonders what the purpose and benefit the mainstream media are to the public now. For quite some time, they have only been the mouth pieces of large corporates and/or the respective governments of the relevant countries.

As you will well know Maryanne, you're part of a dying breed, as a critical investigative, journalistic mind, and that is why your beacon shines so very brightly, amongst the depth of incompetent greyness, that is the afflicted, captured majority of journalists.

Expand full comment

Not good. Not good at all. About time we started having some criminal investigations and class actions against every single person involved.

Expand full comment

Watch out Fauci and Bourla!

Random left brain thought as are many ChatGPT questions:

In mRNA vax contaminated with DNA - is it possible to match the dna to a human or likely relative like in criminal investigations??

Answer:

Yes, it is theoretically possible to match DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines to a specific individual or their relatives using forensic or genealogical techniques. This process involves analyzing the contaminated DNA and comparing it to reference DNA databases. Here’s how it could work:

1. DNA Sequencing: The contaminant DNA would be sequenced to determine its genetic code. If the contamination includes identifiable sequences of human DNA, these can be analyzed further.

2. Comparison to Databases: The DNA sequence can be compared to publicly available or forensic genetic databases. These databases may contain genetic profiles of individuals or patterns characteristic of specific populations or families.

3. Genealogical Matching: If a close match is found in a genetic database, researchers can potentially identify relatives of the individual whose DNA is in the vaccine. This is similar to how familial DNA searches are used in criminal investigations.

4. Likelihood of Success:

• If the DNA contamination is degraded or incomplete, it might be harder to make a match.

• The ability to identify a match depends on whether the DNA in question has distinctive markers and whether related individuals are present in genetic databases.

• The contaminant DNA would also need to contain human genomic material and not just small sequences or plasmids used in the manufacturing process.

5. Ethical and Legal Considerations: Using such techniques raises privacy concerns, as it involves comparing genetic information with databases that might have been built for other purposes, such as genealogy research.

It’s worth noting that identifying the source of DNA contamination in a vaccine typically focuses on ensuring manufacturing quality and safety, rather than tracing it to individuals.

Expand full comment

I've looked at the TGA website and there is a detailed explanation and rebuttal of the suggestion that there is mRNA contamination in the Pfizer/Moderna shots? What part of their response/testing is considered 'incompetent'?

Expand full comment

Despite multiple attempts, the TGA has not responded to questions about the new data. Also, regarding its testing, I wrote about the limitations here:

https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/tga-releases-data-on-residual-dna

And did a short talk with slides here:

https://open.substack.com/pub/maryannedemasi/p/the-great-debate-port-hedland-vs?r=p03ac&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment

Impeccable research and geometric logic in her response. MD easily returns serve and wins the point. Skill, grace and focus on display! 🎾

Expand full comment

That's the best they could do with their 750 employees at their disposal?

Expand full comment